Collins v. Hendrix et al

Filing 35

ORDER that 20 Motion for Reconsideration re 2 Screening Order is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/20/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6

***

7

LEROY COLLINS,

8
9
10

Case No. 2:15-CV-1696 JCM (CWH)
Plaintiff(s),

ORDER

v.
PATRICK HENDRIX, et al.,

11

Defendant(s).

12
13

Presently before the court is pro se plaintiff Leroy Collins’ motion for reconsideration of

14

the court’s screening order (ECF No. 2) regarding plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 3). (ECF No.

15

20). Defendnats Romero Aranas, Greg Cox, and Dwight Nevens filed a response (ECF No. 24),

16

to which plaintiff replied (ECF No. 27).

17

After the court screened the initial complaint, plaintiff filed an amended complaint with

18

the court’s leave. (ECF Nos. 2, 4). The court then screened plaintiff’s amended complaint and

19

entered another screening order, which is the operative screening order. (ECF No. 5).

20
21

Because plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the non-operative screening order, the instant
motion is moot.

22

Accordingly,

23

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 20) be,

24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot.
DATED March 20, 2017.
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE