Collins v. Hendrix et al

Filing 76

ORDER that 70 Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Request for Admissions is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that 72 Motion for Leave to File Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 2/28/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 LEROY COLLINS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) PATRICK HENDRIX, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) _______________________________________ ) Case No. 2:15-cv-01696-JCM-CWH ORDER Presently before the Court are Defendants’ motion to extend time to respond to Plaintiff’s 11 request for admissions (ECF No. 70), filed on January 23, 2018, and Defendants’ motion for leave to 12 file response to Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions (ECF No. 72), filed on February 2, 2018. No 13 response has been filed to either motion. 14 Under Local Rule 7-2(d), the “failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in 15 response to any motion, except a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 or a motion for attorney’s fees, 16 constitutes a consent to the granting of the motion.” As no response has been filed to either motion, 17 the Court will grant both. 18 19 20 21 22 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to extend time to respond to Plaintiff’s request for admissions (ECF No. 70) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for leave to file response to Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions (ECF No. 72) is GRANTED. DATED: February 28, 2018 23 24 _________________________________ C.W. Hoffman, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?