Collins v. Hendrix et al
Filing
76
ORDER that 70 Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Request for Admissions is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that 72 Motion for Leave to File Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 2/28/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
LEROY COLLINS,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
PATRICK HENDRIX, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
_______________________________________ )
Case No. 2:15-cv-01696-JCM-CWH
ORDER
Presently before the Court are Defendants’ motion to extend time to respond to Plaintiff’s
11
request for admissions (ECF No. 70), filed on January 23, 2018, and Defendants’ motion for leave to
12
file response to Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions (ECF No. 72), filed on February 2, 2018. No
13
response has been filed to either motion.
14
Under Local Rule 7-2(d), the “failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in
15
response to any motion, except a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 or a motion for attorney’s fees,
16
constitutes a consent to the granting of the motion.” As no response has been filed to either motion,
17
the Court will grant both.
18
19
20
21
22
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to extend time to respond to
Plaintiff’s request for admissions (ECF No. 70) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for leave to file response to Plaintiff’s
motion for sanctions (ECF No. 72) is GRANTED.
DATED: February 28, 2018
23
24
_________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
25
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?