Collins v. Hendrix et al

Filing 97

ORDER granting 96 Motion to Extend Time to Reply re 84 Motion for Summary Judgment until 14 days after the Court's ruling on 91 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/25/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6

***

7

LEROY COLLINS,

8

Plaintiff(s),

9
10

Case No. 2:15-CV-1696 JCM (CWH)
ORDER

v.
PATRICK HENDRIX, et al.,

11

Defendant(s).

12
13
14

Presently before the court is defendants Romeo Aranas, James Cox, Patrick Hendricks, and
Dwight Neven’s (collectively “defendants”) motion to extend time to file reply. (ECF No. 96).

15

On August 9, 2018, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 84). On

16

September 7, 2018, plaintiff Leroy Collins filed a response. (ECF No. 90). On September 11,

17

2018, defendants filed a motion to strike plaintiff’s response for being nearly twice the maximum

18

length permitted under Local Rule 7-3(c). (ECF No. 91). The deadline for plaintiff to file a

19

response to defendants’ motion to strike has not passed.

20

Now, defendants request the court to extend the deadline to file a reply to fourteen (14)

21

days after the court’s ruling on defendants’ motion to strike (ECF No. 91). (ECF No. 96). Because

22

the court’s ruling will determine whether defendants may need to file a reply, the court will grant

23

defendants’ motion to extend.

24

...

25

...

26

...

27

...

28

...

James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

1

Accordingly,

2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to extend time (ECF No. 96) be, and

3
4
5
6

the same hereby is, GRANTED.
DATED September 25, 2018.
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

-2-