Bank of America, N.A. v. Premier One Holdings, Inc. et al

Filing 54

ORDER granting 53 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Sarah Morris and Timothy A Wiseman are substituted in place of Joseph Y Hong for Premier One Holdings, Inc.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 12/13/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
    1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 *** 6 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., 7 8 9 Case No. 2:15-cv-01731-APG-PAL Plaintiff, ORDER v. (Subst Atty – ECF No. 53) PREMIER ONE HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Defendants. 10 This matter is before the court on the Substitution of Attorneys (ECF No. 53). Sarah Morris 11 and Timothy Wiseman of Morris Law Center seek leave to be substituted in the place of Joseph 12 Hong of Hong & Hong for Premier One Holdings, Inc. LR IA 11-6(b) provides that “[n]o attorney 13 may withdraw after appearing in a case except by leave of the court after notice has been served 14 on the affected client and opposing counsel.” LR IA 11-6(c) provides that the signature of an 15 attorney to substitute in a case “constitutes an express acceptance of all dates then set for pretrial 16 proceedings, for trial or hearing, by the discovery plan, or in any court order.” LR IA 11-6(d) also 17 provides that the substitution of an attorney “shall not alone be reason for delay of pretrial 18 proceedings, discovery, the trial, or any hearing in this case.” 19 Having reviewed and considered the matter, 20 IT IS ORDERED that: 21 1. The Substitution of Attorney (ECF No. 53) is GRANTED. 22 2. Sarah Morris and Timothy Wiseman of Morris Law Center are substituted in the place 23 of Joseph Hong of Hong & Hong for Premier One Holdings, Inc. subject to the 24 provisions of LR IA 11-6(b), (c) and (d). 25 26 DATED this 13th day of December, 2018. 27 PEGGY A. LEEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?