Vigil v. HUD Washingon D.C. et al
Filing
2
ORDER Denying without prejudice, 1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have until 10/9/15, in which to submit a completed application that includes the information discussed in this O rder, or to pay the $400.00 filing fee. Failure to comply with this Order will result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 9/24/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - Blank IFP application mailed to Plaintiff 9/25/15 - PS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
MICHAEL VIGIL,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
SOUTHERN NEVADA REGIONAL HOUSING )
)
AUTHORITY, et al.,
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:15-cv-01738-APG-CWH
ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiff Michael Vigil’s (“plaintiff”) Application for Leave to Proceed In
Forma Pauperis (doc. # 1), filed September 10, 2015.
18
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), a filing fee of $350.00 is required to commence a civil action
19
in federal district court in addition to a $50.00 administrative fee, effective May 1, 2013, for a total of
20
$400.00. The court may authorize the commencement of an action “without prepayment of fees and
21
costs or security therefor, by a person who makes an affidavit that he is unable to pay such costs or
22
give security therefore.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).
23
Plaintiff submitted the affidavit required by § 1915(a) to show that he is unable to prepay fees
24
and costs or give security for them. However, a review of plaintiff’s application reveals that he failed
25
to fill out all letter items under number 3 of his application form. See Doc. # 1. Based on the
26
documents attached to plaintiff’s application, moreover, it appears plaintiff receives food stamps but
27
failed to include this information in his application form. It also appears that plaintiff has received
28
$41,025.00 in social security benefits, as stated under number 2 of the application, but it is unclear to
1
the Court whether this amount is correct, and whether it was received on a yearly or other basis and
2
not on a monthly basis as plaintiff has alleged. Because the information provided for review is
3
incomplete and unclear, this Court is unable to determine whether plaintiff can afford the filing fee
4
required to pursue the instant action.
5
6
7
8
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s Application for Leave to Proceed
In Forma Pauperis (doc. # 1) is denied without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mail plaintiff a blank Application
to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.
9
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall have until Friday, October 9, 2015, in
10
which to submit a completed application that includes the information discussed in this order, or to pay
11
the $400.00 filing fee. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this case
12
be dismissed. The Clerk of Court shall retain plaintiff’s Complaint.
13
DATED: September 24, 2015
14
15
16
______________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?