Vigil v. HUD Washingon D.C. et al

Filing 31

ORDER Granting 26 Motion to Strike. Pages two through seven of Plaintiff's demand for jury trial 25 shall be disregarded for all purposes in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 2/8/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

MICHAEL VIGIL,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
HUD WASH D.C., SNRHA, et al,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
_______________________________________ )

Case No. 2:15-cv-01738-APG-CWH

ORDER

Presently before the Court is Defendants’ motion to strike (ECF No. 26), filed on November

11

28, 2016. Pro se Plaintiff Michael Virgil filed a response (ECF No. 27) on December 9, 2016, and

12

Defendants filed a reply (ECF No. 30), filed on December 16, 2016.

13

Defendants request that the Court strike portions of Plaintiff’s demand for trial by jury (ECF

14

No. 25) that they argue contain extraneous allegations. Upon review, ECF No. 25 contains a demand

15

for trial by jury as well as allegations against Defendants, and proffers of Plaintiff’s trustworthiness.

16

The Court construes ECF No. 25 as a combined demand for trial by jury and motion to supplement

17

to the pleadings.

18

Under Local Rule 7-2(g), a party may not file supplemental pleadings, briefs, authorities, or

19

evidence without leave of the Court granted for good cause. Plaintiff has not requested leave to file

20

the supplementary material, and the Court does not find good cause to do so.

21

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to strike (ECF No. 26) is

22

GRANTED. Pages two through seven of Plaintiff’s demand for jury trial (ECF No. 25) shall be

23

disregarded for all purposes in this case.

24

DATED: February 8, 2017.

25
26

_________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge

27
28

1