United States of America v. 400 Acres of Land, more or less, situate in Lincoln County, State of Nevada
Filing
620
ORDER granting 619 Stipulation Regarding Certain Exhibits in Evidence. Please see the order for specifics. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/24/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
LAW OFFICES OF KERMITT L. WATERS
Kermitt L. Waters, Esq., Bar No. 2571
kermitt@kermittwaters.com
James J. Leavitt, Esq., Bar No. 6032
jim@kermittwaters.com
Michael A. Schneider, Esq., Bar No. 8887
michael@kermittwaters.com
Autumn L. Waters, Esq., Bar No. 8917
autumn@kermittwaters.com
704 South Ninth Street
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone:
(702) 733-8877
Facsimile:
(702) 731-1964
Attorneys for Defendants
Sheahan Landowners
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
13
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
14
15
16
17
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 2:15-cv-01743-MMD-NJK
STIPULATION REGARDING CERTAIN
EXHIBITS IN EVIDENCE
400 ACRES OF LAND, more or less,
situate in Lincoln County, State of Nevada;
and JESSIE J. COX, et al.,
18
19
Defendants.
20
The Parties respectfully submit the following Stipulation Regarding Certain Exhibits In
21
Evidence to clarify the record. The Parties seek to withdraw certain exhibits from evidence which
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
were previously stipulated admissible by the Parties but which were not used at trial. Additionally,
the parties seek to identify certain exhibits previously stipulated admissible which shall remain in
evidence even though not used at trial.
1
2
3
RECITALS
WHEREAS, on January 29, 2020, the Parties stipulated to the admissibility of certain
exhibits (ECF No. 582). The Court approved this stipulation on January 30, 2020;
4
WHEREAS, the trial of this matter concluded on February 18, 2020;
5
WHEREAS, certain exhibits that were entered into evidence as a result of the Court’s
6
7
8
9
approval of ECF No. 582 where not used by either party at the trial of this matter;
WHEREAS, the Parties would like to identify those stipulated exhibits which should be
withdrawn and which should remain in evidence; and,
WHEREAS, the Parties respectfully request that the Court so order the below stipulation.
10
STIPULATION
11
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree that the following Plaintiff’s
12
exhibits be withdrawn from evidence: 24, 29, 33, 50, 52, 228, 276, 279, 280, 283, 292, 311, 341,
13
360, 364, 459, 521, 538, 546, 547, 557.
14
15
16
17
18
19
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree that the following Defendants’
exhibits be withdrawn from evidence: 7.2a, 7.7d, 7.7e, 7.7f, 7.9a, 7.15a, 26, 66c, 66e, 103, 227.
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree that the following Defendants’
exhibits shall remain in evidence: 54, 66, 69c, 73, 87.
WHEREFORE, the Parties respectfully request that the Court so order the above
stipulation.
20
IT IS SO ORDERED:
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: February 24, 2020
___________________________________
MIRANDA M. DU
United States District Judge
1
FOR THE PARTIES:
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Dated February 20, 2020
FOR PLAINTIFF:
/s/ Eugene N. Hansen
EUGENE N. HANSEN
ANTHONY C. GENTNER
MARK C. ELMER
READE E. WILSON
Trial Attorneys
U.S. Department of Justice
Counsel for the United States
11
12
FOR THE SHEAHAN LANDOWNERS
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
/s/ James J. Leavitt
KERMITT L. WATERS, Bar No. 2571
JAMES J. LEAVITT, Bar No. 6032
MICHAEL A. SCHNEIDER, Bar No. 8887
AUTUMN L. WATERS, Bar No. 8917
704 South Ninth Street
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone: (702) 733-8877
Email: jim@kermittwaters.com
Counsel for Defendant Sheahan Landowners
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FOR THE TANIS LANDOWNERS
/s/ John R. Funk
MARK H. GUNDERSON, Bar No. 2134
JOHN R. FUNK, Bar No. 12372
AUSTIN K. SWEET, Bar No. 11725
3895 Warren Way
Reno, Nevada 89509
Telephone: (775) 829-1222
Email: jfunk@gundersonlaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Tanis Landowners
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?