United States of America v. 400 Acres of Land, more or less, situate in Lincoln County, State of Nevada

Filing 620

ORDER granting 619 Stipulation Regarding Certain Exhibits in Evidence. Please see the order for specifics. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/24/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 LAW OFFICES OF KERMITT L. WATERS Kermitt L. Waters, Esq., Bar No. 2571 kermitt@kermittwaters.com James J. Leavitt, Esq., Bar No. 6032 jim@kermittwaters.com Michael A. Schneider, Esq., Bar No. 8887 michael@kermittwaters.com Autumn L. Waters, Esq., Bar No. 8917 autumn@kermittwaters.com 704 South Ninth Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: (702) 733-8877 Facsimile: (702) 731-1964 Attorneys for Defendants Sheahan Landowners 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:15-cv-01743-MMD-NJK STIPULATION REGARDING CERTAIN EXHIBITS IN EVIDENCE 400 ACRES OF LAND, more or less, situate in Lincoln County, State of Nevada; and JESSIE J. COX, et al., 18 19 Defendants. 20 The Parties respectfully submit the following Stipulation Regarding Certain Exhibits In 21 Evidence to clarify the record. The Parties seek to withdraw certain exhibits from evidence which 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 were previously stipulated admissible by the Parties but which were not used at trial. Additionally, the parties seek to identify certain exhibits previously stipulated admissible which shall remain in evidence even though not used at trial. 1 2 3 RECITALS WHEREAS, on January 29, 2020, the Parties stipulated to the admissibility of certain exhibits (ECF No. 582). The Court approved this stipulation on January 30, 2020; 4 WHEREAS, the trial of this matter concluded on February 18, 2020; 5 WHEREAS, certain exhibits that were entered into evidence as a result of the Court’s 6 7 8 9 approval of ECF No. 582 where not used by either party at the trial of this matter; WHEREAS, the Parties would like to identify those stipulated exhibits which should be withdrawn and which should remain in evidence; and, WHEREAS, the Parties respectfully request that the Court so order the below stipulation. 10 STIPULATION 11 NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree that the following Plaintiff’s 12 exhibits be withdrawn from evidence: 24, 29, 33, 50, 52, 228, 276, 279, 280, 283, 292, 311, 341, 13 360, 364, 459, 521, 538, 546, 547, 557. 14 15 16 17 18 19 NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree that the following Defendants’ exhibits be withdrawn from evidence: 7.2a, 7.7d, 7.7e, 7.7f, 7.9a, 7.15a, 26, 66c, 66e, 103, 227. NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree that the following Defendants’ exhibits shall remain in evidence: 54, 66, 69c, 73, 87. WHEREFORE, the Parties respectfully request that the Court so order the above stipulation.  20 IT IS SO ORDERED: 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: February 24, 2020 ___________________________________ MIRANDA M. DU United States District Judge 1 FOR THE PARTIES: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Dated February 20, 2020 FOR PLAINTIFF: /s/ Eugene N. Hansen EUGENE N. HANSEN ANTHONY C. GENTNER MARK C. ELMER READE E. WILSON Trial Attorneys U.S. Department of Justice Counsel for the United States 11 12 FOR THE SHEAHAN LANDOWNERS 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 /s/ James J. Leavitt KERMITT L. WATERS, Bar No. 2571 JAMES J. LEAVITT, Bar No. 6032 MICHAEL A. SCHNEIDER, Bar No. 8887 AUTUMN L. WATERS, Bar No. 8917 704 South Ninth Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: (702) 733-8877 Email: jim@kermittwaters.com Counsel for Defendant Sheahan Landowners 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FOR THE TANIS LANDOWNERS /s/ John R. Funk MARK H. GUNDERSON, Bar No. 2134 JOHN R. FUNK, Bar No. 12372 AUSTIN K. SWEET, Bar No. 11725 3895 Warren Way Reno, Nevada 89509 Telephone: (775) 829-1222 Email: jfunk@gundersonlaw.com Counsel for Defendant Tanis Landowners

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?