My Left Foot Children's Therapy, LLC et al v. Certain Underwriter's at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No. HAH15-0632

Filing 246

ORDER - The hearing on the Pending Motions is hereby rescheduled from October 14, 2021, to December 8, 2021 at 1:00pm before Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. The parties must submit a separate stipulation to Chief Judge Du on the briefing for the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 10/7/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP SHAWN HANSON (admitted pro hac vice) ERIN BREWER (admitted pro hac vice) 580 California Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 765-9500 Facsimile: (415) 765-9501 Email: shanson@akingump.com erin.brewer@akingump.com MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING CRAIG R. ANDERSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6882 10001 Park Run Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Telephone: (702) 382-0711 Facsimile: (702) 382-5816 Email: canderson@maclaw.com 10 11 Attorneys for Plaintiffs My Left Foot Children’s Therapy, LLC, Jon Gottlieb, and Ann Marie Gottlieb 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 15 16 MY LEFT FOOT CHILDREN’S THERAPY, LLC; JON GOTTLIEB AND ANN MARIE GOTTLIEB, 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Plaintiffs, v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. HAH15-0632, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:15-cv-01746-MMD-VCF JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE Plaintiffs My Left Foot Children’s Therapy Services LLC, Jon Gottlieb, and Ann Marie 24 Gottlieb (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Underwriters at Lloyd’s London Subscribing to Policy No. 25 HAH15-0632 (“Defendant”) (together with Plaintiffs, the “parties”) jointly submit this Stipulation to 26 modify: (1) the October 14, 2021 hearing date set by ECF No. 241 on the following motions: ECF 27 Nos. 219, 220, 221, 222, 231, 232, and 233 (the “Pending Motions”), and (2) the time to file a 28 1 JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO. 2:15-CV-01746- MMD-VCF 1 response in opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 240), which was 2 filed September 21, 2021 (the “MPSJ”). In support thereof, the parties state as follows: 3 4 WHEREAS, over the past few months, the parties filed several motions, including the Pending Motions and MPSJ; 5 WHEREAS, the Pending Motions have been fully briefed; 6 WHEREAS, under Local Rule 7-2, Defendant’s deadline to file a response to the MPSJ is 7 October 12, 2021, and Plaintiffs’ deadline to file a reply in support of the MPSJ is 14 days after service 8 of the response; 9 10 WHEREAS, on September 29, 2021, the Court entered an order setting a hearing date on the Pending Motions (see ECF No. 241); 11 WHEREAS, the hearing is currently set for October 14, 2021; 12 WHEREAS, the availability of both parties’ counsel has been affected by personal and medical 13 issues since September 2021 (see ECF No. 243); 14 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have multiple conflicts with the October 14 hearing date, including: (1) 15 lead counsel has a longstanding personal appointment that conflicts with the October 14 date, and (2) 16 another of Plaintiffs’ counsel will be out of the country October 11-21 for a vacation and family 17 engagement that had been scheduled many months prior; 18 19 20 WHEREAS, the briefing schedule on Plaintiffs’ MPSJ also poses additional scheduling conflicts with the hearing date; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have conferred with counsel for Defendant regarding the above, and 21 requested that: (1) the hearing be moved to the week of November 1, 2021, (2) the deadline for 22 Defendant to file its response to Plaintiffs’ MPSJ be moved to October 26, 2021, and (3) the reply in 23 support of Plaintiffs’ MPSJ be moved to November 16, 2021; 24 WHEREAS, there is good cause to postpone the hearing until the week of November 1, 2021 25 and to extend the MPSJ briefing deadlines, and this stipulation is made in good faith, and not for some 26 impermissible purpose such as to harass, delay, or prejudice; 27 WHEREAS, this is the parties’ first request to postpone the hearing and this briefing; 28 2 JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO. 2:15-CV-01746- MMD-VCF 1 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties request that the Court enter an order rescheduling the hearing 2 on the Pending Motions to the week of November 1, 2021 (or to the next available date on the Court’s 3 docket thereafter), and extending the briefing schedule for Plaintiffs’ MPSJ, so that Defendant’s 4 Opposition is due on October 26, 2021, and Plaintiffs’ Reply due November 16, 2021. 5 Dated: October 7, 2021 6 Respectfully Submitted, Respectfully Submitted, AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING By: By: 7 8 9 10 11 12 /s/ Shawn Hanson Shawn Hanson Admitted pro hac vice 580 California Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, CA 94104 Attorneys for Plaintiffs /s/ Craig R. Anderson Craig R. Anderson Nevada Bar No. 6882 10001 Park Run Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 13 14 CHASNOFF MUNGIA VALKENAAR PEPPING & STRIBLING, LLP 15 16 17 18 By: /s/ Adam Kiehne Adam Kiehne Admitted pro hac vice 1020 NE Loop 410, Suite 150 San Antonio, TX 78209 Attorneys for Defendant 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ORDER The hearing on the Pending Motions is hereby rescheduled from October 14, 2021, to December 8, 2021 at 1:00 PM. The briefing schedule for Plaintiffs’ MPSJ is as follows: Defendant’s Opposition due on October 26, 2021, and Plaintiffs’ Reply due on November 16, 2021. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties IT IS SO ORDERED: must submit a separate stipulation to Chief Judge Du on the briefing for the _____________________________________ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10-7-2021 DATED: _________________ 28 3 JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO. 2:15-CV-01746- MMD-VCF 1 2 I, Shawn Hanson, attest that all other signatories listed above, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing. 3 4 /s/ Shawn Hanson Dated: October 7, 2021 5 Shawn Hanson 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO. 2:15-CV-01746- MMD-VCF 1 2 3 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE My Left Foot Children’s Therapy, LLC, et al. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London Subscribing to Policy No. HAH15-0632 U. S. District Court of Nevada Case No. 2:15-cv-01746- MMD-VCF I am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and 5 not a party to the within action; my business address is: 580 California Street, Suite 1500, San 6 Francisco, California 94104. My email address is: lfrance-gorn@akingump.com. On October 7, 2021, 7 I served the foregoing documents described as: 8 9 1. JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE on the interested parties below, using the following means: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 All parties identified for Notice of Electronic Filing generated by the Court’s CM/ECF system under the above-referenced case caption and number BY ELECTRONIC MAIL OR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION: Based on a court order or an agreement of the parties to accept service by e-mail or electronic transmission, I caused the documents to be sent to the respective e-mail addresses of the parties as stated above. I did not receive, within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful. I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of this Court at whose direction the service was made. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on October 7, 2021, at San Francisco, California. 20 /s/ Lorraine France-Gorn Lorraine France-Gorn 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Case No. 2:15-cv-01746- MMD-VCF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?