My Left Foot Children's Therapy, LLC et al v. Certain Underwriter's at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No. HAH15-0632
Filing
246
ORDER - The hearing on the Pending Motions is hereby rescheduled from October 14, 2021, to December 8, 2021 at 1:00pm before Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. The parties must submit a separate stipulation to Chief Judge Du on the briefing for the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 10/7/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
SHAWN HANSON (admitted pro hac vice)
ERIN BREWER (admitted pro hac vice)
580 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
(415) 765-9500
Facsimile:
(415) 765-9501
Email:
shanson@akingump.com
erin.brewer@akingump.com
MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING
CRAIG R. ANDERSON, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6882
10001 Park Run Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Telephone: (702) 382-0711
Facsimile: (702) 382-5816
Email: canderson@maclaw.com
10
11
Attorneys for Plaintiffs My Left Foot Children’s Therapy,
LLC, Jon Gottlieb, and Ann Marie Gottlieb
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
15
16
MY LEFT FOOT CHILDREN’S
THERAPY, LLC; JON GOTTLIEB AND
ANN MARIE GOTTLIEB,
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Plaintiffs,
v.
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT
LLOYD’S LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO
POLICY NO. HAH15-0632,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:15-cv-01746-MMD-VCF
JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY
HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING
SCHEDULE
Plaintiffs My Left Foot Children’s Therapy Services LLC, Jon Gottlieb, and Ann Marie
24
Gottlieb (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Underwriters at Lloyd’s London Subscribing to Policy No.
25
HAH15-0632 (“Defendant”) (together with Plaintiffs, the “parties”) jointly submit this Stipulation to
26
modify: (1) the October 14, 2021 hearing date set by ECF No. 241 on the following motions: ECF
27
Nos. 219, 220, 221, 222, 231, 232, and 233 (the “Pending Motions”), and (2) the time to file a
28
1
JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-01746- MMD-VCF
1
response in opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 240), which was
2
filed September 21, 2021 (the “MPSJ”). In support thereof, the parties state as follows:
3
4
WHEREAS, over the past few months, the parties filed several motions, including the Pending
Motions and MPSJ;
5
WHEREAS, the Pending Motions have been fully briefed;
6
WHEREAS, under Local Rule 7-2, Defendant’s deadline to file a response to the MPSJ is
7
October 12, 2021, and Plaintiffs’ deadline to file a reply in support of the MPSJ is 14 days after service
8
of the response;
9
10
WHEREAS, on September 29, 2021, the Court entered an order setting a hearing date on the
Pending Motions (see ECF No. 241);
11
WHEREAS, the hearing is currently set for October 14, 2021;
12
WHEREAS, the availability of both parties’ counsel has been affected by personal and medical
13
issues since September 2021 (see ECF No. 243);
14
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have multiple conflicts with the October 14 hearing date, including: (1)
15
lead counsel has a longstanding personal appointment that conflicts with the October 14 date, and (2)
16
another of Plaintiffs’ counsel will be out of the country October 11-21 for a vacation and family
17
engagement that had been scheduled many months prior;
18
19
20
WHEREAS, the briefing schedule on Plaintiffs’ MPSJ also poses additional scheduling
conflicts with the hearing date;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have conferred with counsel for Defendant regarding the above, and
21
requested that: (1) the hearing be moved to the week of November 1, 2021, (2) the deadline for
22
Defendant to file its response to Plaintiffs’ MPSJ be moved to October 26, 2021, and (3) the reply in
23
support of Plaintiffs’ MPSJ be moved to November 16, 2021;
24
WHEREAS, there is good cause to postpone the hearing until the week of November 1, 2021
25
and to extend the MPSJ briefing deadlines, and this stipulation is made in good faith, and not for some
26
impermissible purpose such as to harass, delay, or prejudice;
27
WHEREAS, this is the parties’ first request to postpone the hearing and this briefing;
28
2
JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-01746- MMD-VCF
1
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties request that the Court enter an order rescheduling the hearing
2
on the Pending Motions to the week of November 1, 2021 (or to the next available date on the Court’s
3
docket thereafter), and extending the briefing schedule for Plaintiffs’ MPSJ, so that Defendant’s
4
Opposition is due on October 26, 2021, and Plaintiffs’ Reply due November 16, 2021.
5
Dated: October 7, 2021
6
Respectfully Submitted,
Respectfully Submitted,
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER &
FELD LLP
MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING
By:
By:
7
8
9
10
11
12
/s/ Shawn Hanson
Shawn Hanson
Admitted pro hac vice
580 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94104
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
/s/ Craig R. Anderson
Craig R. Anderson
Nevada Bar No. 6882
10001 Park Run Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
13
14
CHASNOFF MUNGIA VALKENAAR
PEPPING & STRIBLING, LLP
15
16
17
18
By: /s/ Adam Kiehne
Adam Kiehne
Admitted pro hac vice
1020 NE Loop 410, Suite 150
San Antonio, TX 78209
Attorneys for Defendant
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
ORDER
The hearing on the Pending Motions is hereby rescheduled from October 14, 2021, to
December 8, 2021 at 1:00 PM.
The briefing schedule for Plaintiffs’ MPSJ is as follows: Defendant’s Opposition due on
October 26, 2021, and Plaintiffs’ Reply due on November 16, 2021.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties
IT IS SO ORDERED:
must submit a separate stipulation to
Chief Judge Du on the briefing for the
_____________________________________
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10-7-2021
DATED: _________________
28
3
JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-01746- MMD-VCF
1
2
I, Shawn Hanson, attest that all other signatories listed above, and on whose behalf the filing is
submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing.
3
4
/s/ Shawn Hanson
Dated: October 7, 2021
5
Shawn Hanson
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-01746- MMD-VCF
1
2
3
4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
My Left Foot Children’s Therapy, LLC, et al. v.
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London Subscribing to Policy No. HAH15-0632
U. S. District Court of Nevada Case No. 2:15-cv-01746- MMD-VCF
I am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and
5
not a party to the within action; my business address is: 580 California Street, Suite 1500, San
6
Francisco, California 94104. My email address is: lfrance-gorn@akingump.com. On October 7, 2021,
7
I served the foregoing documents described as:
8
9
1. JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING
SCHEDULE
on the interested parties below, using the following means:
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
All parties identified for Notice of Electronic Filing generated by the Court’s
CM/ECF system under the above-referenced case caption and number
BY ELECTRONIC MAIL OR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION: Based on a court order or an
agreement of the parties to accept service by e-mail or electronic transmission, I caused the documents
to be sent to the respective e-mail addresses of the parties as stated above. I did not receive, within a
reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or other indication that the transmission
was unsuccessful.
I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of this Court at whose direction the
service was made. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on October 7, 2021, at San Francisco, California.
20
/s/ Lorraine France-Gorn
Lorraine France-Gorn
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Case No. 2:15-cv-01746- MMD-VCF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?