Allstate Insurance Company et al v. Shah, MD et al

Filing 180

ORDER that 73 Defendants' Motion for Sanctions is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/25/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 5 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs, 6 7 8 9 v. RUSSELL J. SHAH, MD, et al., Case No. 2:15-cv-01786-APG-CWH ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (ECF No. 73) Defendants. 10 The defendants move for sanctions against the plaintiffs, asserting that the plaintiffs did 11 not conduct an adequate pre-suit investigation. The defendants request sanctions under Federal 12 Rule of Civil Procedure 11 and the court’s inherent power. 13 I deny the motion without prejudice to assert it later. Considering the evidence presented, 14 the amended complaint is not frivolous or without factual basis. In re Keegan Mgmt. Co., Sec. 15 Litig., 78 F.3d 431, 434 (9th Cir. 1996). Nor is there evidence of bad faith at this time. Fink v. 16 Gomez, 239 F.3d 989, 994 (9th Cir. 2001). The defendants’ motion is based largely on their 17 dissatisfaction with the plaintiffs’ discovery responses. The parties are litigating those matters 18 before the Magistrate Judge. 19 20 21 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the defendants’ motion for sanctions (ECF No. 73) is DENIED without prejudice. DATED this 25th day of September, 2017. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?