Allstate Insurance Company et al v. Shah, MD et al

Filing 205

ORDER granting 202 Stipulation to Extend Time to Reply re: 183 Motion for Summary Judgment. Replies due by 12/22/2017. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 12/12/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
Case 2:15-cv-01786-APG-CWH Document 202 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DENNIS L. KENNEDY Nevada Bar No. 1462 JOSEPH A. LIEBMAN Nevada Bar No. 10125 JOSHUA P. GILMORE Nevada Bar No. 11576 BAILEYKENNEDY 8984 Spanish Ridge Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89148-1302 Telephone: 702.562.8820 Facsimile: 702.562.8821 DKennedy@BaileyKennedy.com JLiebman@BaileyKennedy.com JGilmore@BaileyKennedy.com 8 9 10 11 Attorneys for Defendants & Counterclaimant RUSSELL J. SHAH, M.D.; DIPTI R. SHAH, M.D.; RUSSELL J. SHAH, MD, LTD.; DIPTI R. SHAH, MD, LTD.; and RADAR MEDICAL GROUP, LLP dba UNIVERSITY URGENT CARE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 13 14 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY Case No. 2:15-cv-01786-APG-CWH 15 INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, and ALLSTATE 16 FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR THE 17 Plaintiffs, FILING OF DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR 18 vs. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 19 RUSSELL J. SHAH, M.D.; DIPTI R. SHAH, (Second Request) 20 M.D.; RUSSELL J. SHAH, MD, LTD.; DIPTI R. SHAH, MD, LTD.; and RADAR MEDICAL 21 GROUP, LLP dba UNIVERSITY URGENT CARE, Does 1-100, and ROES 101-200, 22 Defendants. 23 ___________________________________________ 24 AND RELATED CLAIMS. 25 26 27 28 Page 1 of 3 Case 2:15-cv-01786-APG-CWH Document 202 Filed 12/06/17 Page 2 of 3 1 Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE 2 PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, 3 and ALLSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY (the “Allstate Parties”), and 4 Defendants and Counterclaimant RUSSELL J. SHAH, M.D., DIPTI R. SHAH, M.D., RADAR 5 MEDICAL GROUP, LLP dba UNIVERSITY URGENT CARE, RUSSELL J. SHAH, MD, LTD., 6 and DIPTI R. SHAH, MD, LTD. (the “Radar Parties”), by and through their respective attorneys of 7 record, stipulate and agree as follows: 8 9 1. On October 17, 2017, the Radar Parties filed their Motion for Summary Judgment (Hearing Requested) [ECF No. 183] (the “Motion”); 10 2. 11 No. 195]; 12 3. 13 On November 22, 2017, the Allstate Parties filed their Opposition to the Motion [ECF Pursuant to the October 27, 2017 Order [ECF No. 190], the Radar Parties presently have until December 8, 2017 to file their Reply in Support of the Motion; 14 4. In order to accommodate scheduling conflicts for the Radar Parties’ counsel, and due 15 to ongoing efforts by the Radar Parties related to reviewing the Allstate Parties’ supplemental 16 discovery responses, the Radar Parties shall now have up to and including December 22, 2017 to file 17 their Reply in Support of the Motion; and 18 19 /// 20 21 /// 22 23 /// 24 25 /// 26 27 /// 28 Page 2 of 3 Case 2:15-cv-01786-APG-CWH Document 202 Filed 12/06/17 Page 3 of 3 1 2 5. This is the second stipulation for an extension of time to file the Reply in Support of the Motion. This stipulation is made in good faith and not to delay the proceedings. 3 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 4 DATED this 6th day of December, 2017. DATED this 6th day of December, 2017. 5 McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP BAILEYKENNEDY 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 By: By: /s/ Joshua P. Gilmore DENNIS L. KENNEDY JOSEPH A. LIEBMAN JOSHUA P. GILMORE 8984 Spanish Ridge Avenue Las Vegas, NV 89148 /s/ Dylan P. Todd DYLAN P. TODD TODD W. BAXTER 8337 West Sunset Road, Suite 350 Las Vegas, NV 89113 Attorneys for Defendants & Counterclaimant ERON Z. CANNON FAIN ANDERSON VANDERHOEF ROSENDAHL O'HALLORAN SPILLANE PLLC 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4750 Seattle, WA 98104 Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18 DATED: 12/12/2017 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?