Allstate Insurance Company et al v. Shah, MD et al
Filing
205
ORDER granting #202 Stipulation to Extend Time to Reply re: #183 Motion for Summary Judgment. Replies due by 12/22/2017. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 12/12/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Case 2:15-cv-01786-APG-CWH Document 202 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
DENNIS L. KENNEDY
Nevada Bar No. 1462
JOSEPH A. LIEBMAN
Nevada Bar No. 10125
JOSHUA P. GILMORE
Nevada Bar No. 11576
BAILEYKENNEDY
8984 Spanish Ridge Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148-1302
Telephone: 702.562.8820
Facsimile: 702.562.8821
DKennedy@BaileyKennedy.com
JLiebman@BaileyKennedy.com
JGilmore@BaileyKennedy.com
8
9
10
11
Attorneys for Defendants & Counterclaimant
RUSSELL J. SHAH, M.D.; DIPTI R. SHAH,
M.D.; RUSSELL J. SHAH, MD, LTD.; DIPTI
R. SHAH, MD, LTD.; and RADAR
MEDICAL GROUP, LLP dba UNIVERSITY
URGENT CARE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
13
14 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,
ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY
Case No. 2:15-cv-01786-APG-CWH
15 INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE
INDEMNITY COMPANY, and ALLSTATE
16 FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY,
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND DEADLINE FOR THE
17
Plaintiffs,
FILING OF DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN
SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR
18
vs.
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
19
RUSSELL J. SHAH, M.D.; DIPTI R. SHAH,
(Second Request)
20 M.D.; RUSSELL J. SHAH, MD, LTD.; DIPTI
R. SHAH, MD, LTD.; and RADAR MEDICAL
21 GROUP, LLP dba UNIVERSITY URGENT
CARE, Does 1-100, and ROES 101-200,
22
Defendants.
23 ___________________________________________
24
AND RELATED CLAIMS.
25
26
27
28
Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cv-01786-APG-CWH Document 202 Filed 12/06/17 Page 2 of 3
1
Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE
2
PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY,
3
and ALLSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY (the “Allstate Parties”), and
4
Defendants and Counterclaimant RUSSELL J. SHAH, M.D., DIPTI R. SHAH, M.D., RADAR
5
MEDICAL GROUP, LLP dba UNIVERSITY URGENT CARE, RUSSELL J. SHAH, MD, LTD.,
6
and DIPTI R. SHAH, MD, LTD. (the “Radar Parties”), by and through their respective attorneys of
7
record, stipulate and agree as follows:
8
9
1.
On October 17, 2017, the Radar Parties filed their Motion for Summary Judgment
(Hearing Requested) [ECF No. 183] (the “Motion”);
10
2.
11
No. 195];
12
3.
13
On November 22, 2017, the Allstate Parties filed their Opposition to the Motion [ECF
Pursuant to the October 27, 2017 Order [ECF No. 190], the Radar Parties presently
have until December 8, 2017 to file their Reply in Support of the Motion;
14
4.
In order to accommodate scheduling conflicts for the Radar Parties’ counsel, and due
15
to ongoing efforts by the Radar Parties related to reviewing the Allstate Parties’ supplemental
16
discovery responses, the Radar Parties shall now have up to and including December 22, 2017 to file
17
their Reply in Support of the Motion; and
18
19
///
20
21
///
22
23
///
24
25
///
26
27
///
28
Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cv-01786-APG-CWH Document 202 Filed 12/06/17 Page 3 of 3
1
2
5.
This is the second stipulation for an extension of time to file the Reply in Support of
the Motion. This stipulation is made in good faith and not to delay the proceedings.
3
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
4
DATED this 6th day of December, 2017.
DATED this 6th day of December, 2017.
5
McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD,
WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP
BAILEYKENNEDY
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
By:
By:
/s/ Joshua P. Gilmore
DENNIS L. KENNEDY
JOSEPH A. LIEBMAN
JOSHUA P. GILMORE
8984 Spanish Ridge Avenue
Las Vegas, NV 89148
/s/ Dylan P. Todd
DYLAN P. TODD
TODD W. BAXTER
8337 West Sunset Road, Suite 350
Las Vegas, NV 89113
Attorneys for Defendants & Counterclaimant
ERON Z. CANNON
FAIN ANDERSON VANDERHOEF
ROSENDAHL O'HALLORAN
SPILLANE PLLC
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4750
Seattle, WA 98104
Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
18
DATED:
12/12/2017
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?