Allstate Insurance Company et al v. Shah, MD et al

Filing 303

ORDER granting #301 Stipulation to Extend Time to Reply re: #281 Motion for Protective Order. Replies due by 6/22/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 6/14/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1 DYLAN P. TODD
Nevada Bar No. 10456
2 TODD W. BAXTER
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
3 McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD,
WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP
4 8337 West Sunset Road, Suite 350
Las Vegas, Nevada 89113
5 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
6 [e-mail]
[e-mail]
7
ERON Z. CANNON
8 Nevada Bar No. 8013
FAIN ANDERSON VANDERHOEF
9 ROSENDAHL O’HALLORAN SPILLANE PLLC
701 5th Avenue #4750
10 Seattle, Washington 98104
Telephone:
[phone]
11 Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
12
Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants
13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

16

****

17 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,
ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY
18 INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE
INDEMNITY COMPANY, and ALLSTATE
19 FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY,
20
Plaintiffs,
21
v.
22
RUSSELL J. SHAH, MD, DIPTI R. SHAH,
23 MD, RUSSELL J. SHAH, MD, LTD., DIPTI
R. SHAH, MD, LTD., and RADAR
24 MEDICAL GROUP, LLP dba UNIVERSITY
URGENT CARE, DOES 1-100, and ROES
25 101-200,
26

CASE NO.

2:15-cv-01786-APG-CWH

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS’
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
[281]
(First Request)

Defendants.

27
AND RELATED CLAIMS
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
8337 W. SUNSET RD, SUITE 350
LAS VEGAS, NV 89113

2:15-cv-01786-APG-CWH
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER [281]

1

Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants

ALLSTATE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

ALLSTATE

2 PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY,
3 and ALLSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, by and through their attorneys of
4 record of the law firms McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP, and
5 FAIN ANDERSON VANDERHOEF ROSENDAHL O'HALLORAN SPILLANE PLLC, and
6 Defendants and Counterclaimant RUSSELL J. SHAH, M.D., DIPTI R. SHAH, M.D., RUSSELL J.
7 SHAH, MD, LTD., DIPTI R. SHAH, MD, LTD., and RADAR MEDICAL GROUP, LLP dba
8 UNIVERSITY URGENT CARE, by and through their attorneys of record of the law firm BAILEY
9 KENNEDY, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
10

1.

On May 11, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Protective Order [ECF No. 281];

11

2.

Defendants filed a Response on June 6, 2018 [ECF No. 294];

12

3.

Pursuant to an agreement between the parties, Plaintiffs shall now have until June 22,

13
14
15

2018 to file a Reply in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Protective Order; and
4.

This is the first Stipulation to extend the deadline for the Reply to Defendants’
Response. This Stipulation is made in good faith and not to delay the proceedings.

16

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

17

DATED this 13th day of June, 2018.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24

McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD,
WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP
By

/s/ Dylan P. Todd
DYLAN P. TODD, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10456
TODD W. BAXTER, ESQ.
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
8337 West Sunset Road, Suite 350
Las Vegas, NV 89113
Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants

25
26
27
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
8337 W. SUNSET RD, SUITE 350
LAS VEGAS, NV 89113

2:15-cv-01786-APG-CWH
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER [281]

1

DATED this 13th day of June, 2018.

2

BAILEY KENNEDY

3

By

4
5
6
7
8
9

/s/ Joshua P. Gilmore
DENNIS L. KENNEDY, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 1462
JOSEPH A. LIEBMAN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10125
JOSHUA P. GILMORE, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 11576
8984 Spanish Ridge Avenue
Las Vegas, NV 89148
Attorneys for Defendants & Counterclaimant

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

12

DATED: June 14, 2018

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
8337 W. SUNSET RD, SUITE 350
LAS VEGAS, NV 89113

2:15-cv-01786-APG-CWH
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER [281]