Wilson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Filing 95

ORDER re 86 Motion to Appoint Expert and 91 Motion for Sanctions. ORDERED that any opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions Against Wal-Mart for Violating Court Orders (#91) must be filed on or before April 15, 2016. No reply nece ssary. FURTHER ORDERED that a hearing on Defendant Wal-Mart's Motion for Leave to Designate a Rebuttal Expert or, in the alternative, to strike Plaintiff's Designation of Expert Brian Jones (#86) and Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions Against Wal-Mart for Violating Court Orders (#91) is scheduled for 3:00 p.m., April 20, 2016, in courtroom 3D. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 4/11/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 5 KATIE F. WILSON, Plaintiff, 6 7 vs. WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al., 2:15-cv-01791-RCJ-VCF ORDER 8 Defendants. 9 Before the Court are Defendant Wal-Mart's Motion for Leave to Designate a Rebuttal Expert or, 10 in the alternative, to strike Plaintiff's Designation of Expert Brian Jones (#86) and Plaintiff's Motion for 11 Sanctions Against Wal-Mart for Violating Court Orders (#91). 12 Accordingly, 13 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions Against Wal14 Mart for Violating Court Orders (#91) must be filed on or before April 15, 2016. No reply necessary. 15 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a hearing on Defendant Wal-Mart's Motion for Leave to 16 Designate a Rebuttal Expert or, in the alternative, to strike Plaintiff's Designation of Expert Brian Jones 17 (#86) and Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions Against Wal-Mart for Violating Court Orders (#91) is scheduled 18 for 3:00 p.m., April 20, 2016, in courtroom 3D. 19 DATED this 11th day of April, 2016. 20 21 22 23 24 25 _________________________ CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?