Anderson II v. Shellpoint Mortgage SE et al
Filing
4
ORDER that Plaintiff shall file a Certificate of Interested Parties by 10/16/2015. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/9/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EW)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
LLOYD W. ANDERSON II,
8
Plaintiff(s),
9
vs.
10
SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SE, et al.,
11
Defendant(s).
12
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:15-cv-01807-RFB-NJK
ORDER
13
This matter is before the court on the failure of Plaintiff to file a Certificate of Interested Parties.
14
LR 7.1-1(a) requires, unless otherwise ordered, that in all cases (except habeas corpus cases) pro se
15
litigants and counsel for private parties shall, upon entering a case, identify in the disclosure statement
16
required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships or corporations
17
(including parent corporations) which have a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case.
18
LR 7.1-1(b) further states that if there are no known interested parties, other than those participating in
19
the case, a statement to that effect must be filed. Additionally, LR 7.1-1(c) requires a party to promptly
20
file a supplemental certification upon any change in the information that this rule requires. To date,
21
Plaintiff has failed to comply.
22
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a Certificate of Interested Parties, which
23
fully complies with LR 7.1-1, no later than 4:00 p.m., October 16, 2015. Failure to comply may result
24
in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
DATED: October 9, 2015
27
28
______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?