Walker-Goggins v. Social Security Administration

Filing 31

ORDER denying 28 Motion to Bound Over. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/11/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6

***

7

ANNETTE WALKER-GOGGINS,

8

Plaintiff(s),

9
10

Case No. 2:15-CV-1839 JCM (EJY)
ORDER

v.
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

11

Defendant(s).

12
13
14

Presently before the court is pro se plaintiff Annette Walker-Goggins’s motion to
bound over to the federal district court. (ECF No. 28).

15

This is an appeal of the Social Security Administration’s denial of benefits.

16

Plaintiff’s motion is hard to follow. It can best be construed as a request for the federal

17

district court to hear her case.

18

plaintiff’s claims (ECF No. 8), noting that “[t]he facts alleged in plaintiff’s complaint are

19

difficult to follow and incomprehensible,” and are “incoherent, fanciful, and delusional.”

20

(Id. at 2–3). Judge Hoffman recommended the complaint be dismissed with prejudice and

21

this court adopted that recommendation. (ECF No. 13). This case has been closed since

22

May 19, 2016, and plaintiff’s numerous post-judgment motions have all been denied.

23

(Judgment, ECF No. 14).

24

supports her requests. The failure of a party to file points and authorities in support of a

25

motion constitutes consent to the denial of the motion. LR 7-2(d).

26

...

27

...

28

...

James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

But Magistrate Judge Hoffman has already screened

Furthermore, plaintiff does not cite any legal authority that

1

Accordingly,

2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that plaintiff’s motion

3
4
5
6

(ECF No. 28) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.
DATED January 11, 2021.
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

-2-