Campbell, Sr. v. District Attorney of Clark County et al

Filing 13

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. IT IS RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff Nathan Campbell Sr.'s case be DISMISSED without prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 5/18/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 5/4/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
NATHAN CAMPBELL,
7
Plaintiff,
8
vs.
9
10
11

DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CLARK
COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:15-cv-01893-RFB-CWH
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

12
13

On March 30, 2017, the court entered an order denying Plaintiff Nathan Campbell Sr.’s

14

application to proceed in forma pauperis without prejudice. (Order (ECF No. 12).) The order

15

required Plaintiff to file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis or to pay the $400.00

16

fee for filing a civil action by May 1, 2017. (Id. at 6.) The court advised Plaintiff that failure to

17

comply with its order may result in a recommendation that his case be dismissed. (Id.) Plaintiff has

18

not taken any action in this case since the court’s order dated March 30, 2017, and he therefore

19

appears to have abandoned this case.

20
21
22

IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff Nathan Campbell Sr.’s case be
DISMISSED without prejudice.
NOTICE

23

This report and recommendation is submitted to the United States district judge assigned to

24

this case under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party who objects to this report and recommendation may

25

file a written objection supported by points and authorities within fourteen days of being served with

26

this report and recommendation. Local Rule IB 3-2(a). Failure to file a timely objection may waive

1

the right to appeal the district court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991).

2
3

DATED: May 4, 2017

4
5
6

_________________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

2