Campbell, Sr. v. District Attorney of Clark County et al

Filing 21

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 13 the Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 20 Motions are denied as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Nathan Campbell Sr.'s case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order upon Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 12/19/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

***

9

NATHAN CAMPBELL, SR.,

10

PETITIONER,
ORDER

11
12
13

Case No. 2:15-cv-01893-RFB-CWH

v.
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CLARK
COUNTY, et al.,
RESPONDENT’S.

14
15

Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 13] of the

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Honorable Carl W. Hoffman, United States Magistrate Judge, entered May 4, 2017.
A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific
written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is
required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed
findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local
Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct
“any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge.
Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due
by May 18, 2017. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case
and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations.
...

1
2

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 13] is
ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.

3

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that [ECF Nos. 15, 16, 17, 18 & 20] are denied as moot.

4

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Nathan Campbell Sr.’s case is DISMISSED

5
6

without prejudice.
The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order upon Plaintiff.

7
8

DATED: December 19, 2017.
_____________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
United States District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-