Campbell, Sr. v. District Attorney of Clark County et al

Filing 28

ORDER re 25 , 26 , 27 Motions. Given that the case is closed and that it is unclear exactly what relief Campbell seeks by way of these documents, the court will not take further action with respect to these documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 3/8/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
NATHAN CAMPBELL,
7
Plaintiff,
8
vs.
9
10
11

DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CLARK
COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:15-cv-01893-RFB-CWH
ORDER

12
13

Presently before the court is pro se plaintiff Nathan Campbell’s document titled “Quasi in

14

Rem Action; Habeas Corpus Certiorari; Motion in Limine; Request for Independant [sic] Counsel &

15

Administrative Hearing; Fdr. C. P. #18 & 19 Joinder of Claims” (ECF Nos. 25, 26), filed on January

16

31, 2018. Also before the court is Campbell’s document titled “Amended Complaint; Quasi in Rem

17

Action; Habeas Corpus-Certiorari; Motion in Limine; De Novo Review” (ECF No. 27), filed on

18

January 31, 2018.

19

This case was dismissed without prejudice on December 20, 2017. (Order (ECF No. 21); J.

20

(ECF No. 22).) Given that the case is closed and that it is unclear exactly what relief Campbell seeks

21

by way of these documents, the court will not take further action with respect to these documents.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23

DATED: March 8, 2018

24
25
26

_________________________________________
C.W. HOFFMAN, JR.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE