Campbell, Sr. v. District Attorney of Clark County et al
ORDER re 25 , 26 , 27 Motions. Given that the case is closed and that it is unclear exactly what relief Campbell seeks by way of these documents, the court will not take further action with respect to these documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 3/8/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CLARK
COUNTY, et al.,
Presently before the court is pro se plaintiff Nathan Campbell’s document titled “Quasi in
Rem Action; Habeas Corpus Certiorari; Motion in Limine; Request for Independant [sic] Counsel &
Administrative Hearing; Fdr. C. P. #18 & 19 Joinder of Claims” (ECF Nos. 25, 26), filed on January
31, 2018. Also before the court is Campbell’s document titled “Amended Complaint; Quasi in Rem
Action; Habeas Corpus-Certiorari; Motion in Limine; De Novo Review” (ECF No. 27), filed on
January 31, 2018.
This case was dismissed without prejudice on December 20, 2017. (Order (ECF No. 21); J.
(ECF No. 22).) Given that the case is closed and that it is unclear exactly what relief Campbell seeks
by way of these documents, the court will not take further action with respect to these documents.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: March 8, 2018
C.W. HOFFMAN, JR.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?