Mitchell v. American/US Airways
Filing
14
ORDER Granting 13 Motion to Extend Time to Answer/Respond re 9 Amended Complaint. US Airways/American Airlines answer due 4/28/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/14/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Case 2:15-cv-01921-JAD-PAL Document 13 Filed 04/12/17 Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Jill Garcia, Esq.
Nevada Bar No.: 7805
jill.garcia@ogletree.com
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
Wells Fargo Tower
3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1500
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Telephone: 702.369.6800
Fax: 702.369.5694
Attorneys for Defendant American Airlines, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
CHARITY MITCHELL,
Case No.: 2:15-cv-01921-JAD-PAL
11
Wells Fargo Tower
Suite 1500, 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Telephone: 702.369.5694
Ogletree. Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
8
Plaintiff,
12
13
vs.
14
U.S. AIRWAYS/AMERICAN AIRLINES,
15
Defendant.
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR DEFENDANT
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. TO
ANSWER OR OTHERWISE
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
(FIRST REQUEST)
16
17
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) and Local Rule 6-1 of the Local Rules of Practice of
18
19
the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Defendant American Airlines,
20
Inc. (“Defendant”)1, seeks an extension of time, through and including April 28, 2017, in
21
which to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”)
22
//
23
24
//
25
26
27
28
The Second Amended Complaint improperly names “U.S. Airways/American Airlines” as the
Defendant. Plaintiff’s employer was US Airways, Inc. However, on December 30, 2015, US
Airways, Inc. ceased to exist as a separate entity and merged into American Airlines, Inc. The
correct name of the Defendant is therefore American Airlines, Inc.
1
Case 2:15-cv-01921-JAD-PAL Document 13 Filed 04/12/17 Page 2 of 4
1
(ECF. No. 9). This is Defendant’s first request for an extension of time. This Motion is
2
supported by the following Memorandum of Points and Authorities.
3
Dated this 12th day of April, 2017.
4
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK
& STEWART, P.C.
5
6
7
/s/ Jill Garcia
Jill Garcia
Wells Fargo Tower
3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1500
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Telephone: 702.369.6800
Attorneys for Defendant American Airlines, Inc.
8
10
11
12
Wells Fargo Tower
Suite 1100, 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Telephone: 702.791.7600
Ogletree. Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
9
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS & AUTHORITIES
13
Plaintiff filed her SAC on August 9, 2016, alleging disability discrimination and
14
15
retaliation claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”).
16
17
On March 16, 2017, Magistrate Judge Peggy Leen issued a Screening Order and
Report of Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 10). Magistrate Leen permitted the
18
19
ADA
and
retaliation
claims
to
proceed
against
the
named
Defendant,
US
20
Airways/American Airlines, but recommended dismissing Plaintiff’s claims against the
21
three individual employee Defendants as ADA claims are properly asserted against the
22
employer, not individual employees. The Court adopted the Report and Recommendation
23
24
25
26
27
on April 5, 2017, and dismissed the individually named Defendants with prejudice (ECF
No. 12).
At this time, Defendant is in the process of gathering and reviewing relevant
information to adequately respond to Plaintiff’s SAC.
28
2
However, Defendant requires
Case 2:15-cv-01921-JAD-PAL Document 13 Filed 04/12/17 Page 3 of 4
1
additional time to finish compiling and reviewing relevant information and to prepare a
2
response. Therefore, Defendant requests an additional two weeks (through and including
3
April 28, 2017) to answer or otherwise respond to the SAC. This is Defendant’s first
4
5
request for an extension of time to respond to the SAC. This request is made in good faith
6
and will not cause undue prejudice to Plaintiff. Accordingly, Defendant’s request for an
7
extension should be granted.
8
10
Dated this 12th day of April, 2017.
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.
11
12
Wells Fargo Tower
Suite 1100, 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Telephone: 702.791.7600
Ogletree. Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
9
13
14
15
16
/s/ Jill Garcia
Jill Garcia
Wells Fargo Tower
3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1500
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Telephone: 702.369.6800
Attorneys for Defendant American Airlines, Inc.
17
18
19
20
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
______________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
________________________________
DATED: April 14, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DATED: April 14, 2017
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case 2:15-cv-01921-JAD-PAL Document 13 Filed 04/12/17 Page 4 of 4
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I hereby certify that I electronically transmitted the foregoing Motion For Extension Of
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (First Request) to the Clerk’s Office using the
CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing.
I also hereby further certify that service of the foregoing Motion For Extension Of
Time For Defendant American Airlines, Inc., To Answer Or Otherwise Respond To
Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (First Request) was also made by depositing a
11
Wells Fargo Tower
Suite 1500, 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Telephone: 702.369.5694
Ogletree. Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
9
Time For Defendant American Airlines, Inc., To Answer Or Otherwise Respond To
true and correct copy of same for mailing, first class mail, postage prepaid thereon, at Las
12
Vegas, Nevada, addressed to the following:
13
14
15
16
Charity Mitchell
1130 White Rock Road #112
El Dorado Hills, California 95762
Pro Per Plaintiff
DATED this 12th day of April, 2017.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
/s/ Darhyl Kerr
An Employee Of Ogletree, Deakins, Nash,
Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?