Mitchell v. American/US Airways

Filing 14

ORDER Granting 13 Motion to Extend Time to Answer/Respond re 9 Amended Complaint. US Airways/American Airlines answer due 4/28/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/14/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
Case 2:15-cv-01921-JAD-PAL Document 13 Filed 04/12/17 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Jill Garcia, Esq. Nevada Bar No.: 7805 jill.garcia@ogletree.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. Wells Fargo Tower 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1500 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: 702.369.6800 Fax: 702.369.5694 Attorneys for Defendant American Airlines, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 CHARITY MITCHELL, Case No.: 2:15-cv-01921-JAD-PAL 11 Wells Fargo Tower Suite 1500, 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: 702.369.5694 Ogletree. Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. 8 Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. 14 U.S. AIRWAYS/AMERICAN AIRLINES, 15 Defendant. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) 16 17 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) and Local Rule 6-1 of the Local Rules of Practice of 18 19 the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Defendant American Airlines, 20 Inc. (“Defendant”)1, seeks an extension of time, through and including April 28, 2017, in 21 which to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) 22 // 23 24 // 25 26 27 28 The Second Amended Complaint improperly names “U.S. Airways/American Airlines” as the Defendant. Plaintiff’s employer was US Airways, Inc. However, on December 30, 2015, US Airways, Inc. ceased to exist as a separate entity and merged into American Airlines, Inc. The correct name of the Defendant is therefore American Airlines, Inc. 1 Case 2:15-cv-01921-JAD-PAL Document 13 Filed 04/12/17 Page 2 of 4 1 (ECF. No. 9). This is Defendant’s first request for an extension of time. This Motion is 2 supported by the following Memorandum of Points and Authorities. 3 Dated this 12th day of April, 2017. 4 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 5 6 7 /s/ Jill Garcia Jill Garcia Wells Fargo Tower 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1500 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: 702.369.6800 Attorneys for Defendant American Airlines, Inc. 8 10 11 12 Wells Fargo Tower Suite 1100, 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: 702.791.7600 Ogletree. Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. 9 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS & AUTHORITIES 13 Plaintiff filed her SAC on August 9, 2016, alleging disability discrimination and 14 15 retaliation claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”). 16 17 On March 16, 2017, Magistrate Judge Peggy Leen issued a Screening Order and Report of Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 10). Magistrate Leen permitted the 18 19 ADA and retaliation claims to proceed against the named Defendant, US 20 Airways/American Airlines, but recommended dismissing Plaintiff’s claims against the 21 three individual employee Defendants as ADA claims are properly asserted against the 22 employer, not individual employees. The Court adopted the Report and Recommendation 23 24 25 26 27 on April 5, 2017, and dismissed the individually named Defendants with prejudice (ECF No. 12). At this time, Defendant is in the process of gathering and reviewing relevant information to adequately respond to Plaintiff’s SAC. 28 2 However, Defendant requires Case 2:15-cv-01921-JAD-PAL Document 13 Filed 04/12/17 Page 3 of 4 1 additional time to finish compiling and reviewing relevant information and to prepare a 2 response. Therefore, Defendant requests an additional two weeks (through and including 3 April 28, 2017) to answer or otherwise respond to the SAC. This is Defendant’s first 4 5 request for an extension of time to respond to the SAC. This request is made in good faith 6 and will not cause undue prejudice to Plaintiff. Accordingly, Defendant’s request for an 7 extension should be granted. 8 10 Dated this 12th day of April, 2017. OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 11 12 Wells Fargo Tower Suite 1100, 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: 702.791.7600 Ogletree. Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. 9 13 14 15 16 /s/ Jill Garcia Jill Garcia Wells Fargo Tower 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1500 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: 702.369.6800 Attorneys for Defendant American Airlines, Inc. 17 18 19 20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. ______________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ________________________________ DATED: April 14, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED: April 14, 2017 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case 2:15-cv-01921-JAD-PAL Document 13 Filed 04/12/17 Page 4 of 4 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I hereby certify that I electronically transmitted the foregoing Motion For Extension Of 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (First Request) to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing. I also hereby further certify that service of the foregoing Motion For Extension Of Time For Defendant American Airlines, Inc., To Answer Or Otherwise Respond To Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (First Request) was also made by depositing a 11 Wells Fargo Tower Suite 1500, 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: 702.369.5694 Ogletree. Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. 9 Time For Defendant American Airlines, Inc., To Answer Or Otherwise Respond To true and correct copy of same for mailing, first class mail, postage prepaid thereon, at Las 12 Vegas, Nevada, addressed to the following: 13 14 15 16 Charity Mitchell 1130 White Rock Road #112 El Dorado Hills, California 95762 Pro Per Plaintiff DATED this 12th day of April, 2017. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /s/ Darhyl Kerr An Employee Of Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?