Vidal v. Schmitt et al
ORDER Denying 36 Motion to Extend Time. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that attorney Craig Mueller must serve a copy of this order on Plaintiffs and file proof of that service by 9/1/17. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 8/24/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
FRANCISCO VIDAL, et al.,
JOE LOMBARDO, et al.,
Case No. 2:15-cv-01943-RFB-CWH
Presently before the court is Plaintiffs Sandra Scharas and Francisco Vidal’s Motion for
Extension of Time to Respond to Motion for Sanctions (ECF No. 36), filed on August 21, 2017.
Ms. Scharas filed this motion on a pro se basis, stating that she and Mr. Vidal need additional time
to respond to the pending motion for sanctions because their attorney is moving to withdraw and
they are looking for a new attorney.
Plaintiffs’ attorney has filed a motion to withdraw that is pending before the court. (Mot. to
Withdraw (ECF No. 38).) Before moving to withdraw, however, Plaintiffs’ attorney responded to
the motion for sanctions. (Resp. to Mot. for Sanctions (ECF No. 37).) The court therefore will
deny Plaintiffs’ pro se motion for additional time to respond to the motion for sanctions as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that attorney Craig Mueller must serve a copy of this order on
Plaintiffs and file proof of that service by September 1, 2017.
DATED: August 24, 2017
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?