Vidal v. Schmitt et al

Filing 54

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 49 the Motion to Take Incarcerated Plaintiff Vidal's Deposition is Granted. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Vidal's Deposition be taken on 11/30/17 at 9:00 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 11/7/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
Case 2:15-cv-01943-RFB-CWH Document 51 Filed 11/06/17 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 Marquis Aurbach Coffing Nick D. Crosby, Esq. Nevada Bar No. $996 Jackie V. Nichols, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14246 10001 Park Run Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Telephone:(702)382-0711 Facsimile:(702) 382-5816 ncrosby@maclaw.com jnichols~maclaw.com Attorneys for Defendants, LVMPD,Matthew Jogodka, Cynthia Sauchak and Enrique Hernandez 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT CQURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVAAA 10 ' Case Number: 2:15-cv-01943-RFB-CWH FRANCISCO VIDAL, an individual; 11 SANDRA SCHAR.AS, an individual, r.~ Plaintiffs, 12 ~, °° U ~~ 13 x ~~M O fPROPOSED ORDER vs. ~~ U ~`~~ 14 LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE ~~~ DEPARTMENT,a political entity; ~~ x z w 15 MATTHEW JOGODKA,aka David Davis, a ~~ an agent and Officer of Las Vegas ~ o>o 16 Metropolitan Police Department; JOSEPH .-+'~N SCHMITT, an agent and Officer of Las ~ a~ ~ o 17 Vegas Metropolitan Police Department; ry CYNTHIA SAUCHAK,an agent and Officer 18 of Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department; ENRIQUE HERNANDEZ,an 19 agent and Officer of Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department; HEATHER JOGODKA, 20 aka Kari Davis, an individual; and DOE OFFICERS I through X,inclusive, 21 Defendants. 22 23 Pursuant to Minute Order [ECF No. 50], and after review and consideration of 24 Defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Matthew Jogodka, Cynthia Sauchak 25 and Enrique Hernandez (collectively "Defendants) Request for Leave to Take Incarcerated 26 Plaintiff Vidal's Deposition [ECF No. 49], and good cause appearing, NOW, 27 Page 1 of 3 MAC:14687-064 3238502 1 1 1/6/2017 7:25 AM Case 2:15-cv-01943-RFB-CWH Document 51 Filed 11/06/17 Page 2 of 3 1 IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT 2 Plaintiff Vidal's Deposition be taken on November 30, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. 7th day of November, 2017. IT IS SO ORDERED this 3 4~ 5 United States Magistrate Judge 6 7 Submitted by: 8 MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING 9 10 ~ 11 12 O U °° 13 ~' ~ N N ~ M 'Go~oN UQ~~ 14 ~~~ ~~`~ ~~~~ 15 a By:/s/Jackie V. Nichols Nick D. Crosby, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8996 Jackie V. Nichols, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14246 10001 Park Run Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Attorneys for Defendants, LVMPD,Matthew Jogodka, Cynthia Sauchak and Enrique Hernandez 'Q' 0 > a 16 o .-~ `~ N H ~ M ~ O I/ ~ 18 19 20 21 '. 22 23 24 25 26 27 Page 2 of 3 MAC:14687-Q64 3238502 1 11/6/2017 725 AM Case 2:15-cv-01943-RFB-CWH Document 51 Filed 11/06/17 Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 I hereby certify that I electronically filed the.foregoing[PROPOSER]ORDER with 2 3 the Clerk of the Court far the United States District Court by using the court's CM/ECF 4 system on the 6th day of November, 2Q17. ~, I further certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/~CF users' 5 6 and that service will be accomplished by the CM/ECF system. ~ 7 I further certify that some of the participants in the case are not registered CM/ECF users. I have mailed the foregoing document by First-Class Mail, postage prepaid, 9 or have dispatched it to a third party commercial carrier for delivery within 3 calendar days 10 to the following non-CM/ECF participants: ~ Z Sandra Scharas 7201 Washington Avenue, Apt I Whittier, CA 90602 In Proper Person 11 12 O U °° ~' ~; 13 Francisco Vidal Southern Desert Correctional 20825 Cold Creek Road Indian Springs, Nevada 89070 In Proper Person ~~ M V ~°°' 14 ~b~ ~a~ ~ ~~~ 1S ~ a c~n~ , ~ o>~ 16 ~~ p•~ ~~M a ~ q .. , ~/ is An employee of Marquis Aurbach Coffing 19 ! 20 ' 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Page 3 of 3 MAC:14687-064 3238502 I I 1 /6/2017 725 AM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?