Chapman v. Fertitta Entertainment Inc., et al
Filing
52
ORDER that counsel for the parties shall file a Proposed Joint Pretrial Order by 11/20/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 11/13/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
7
8
9
10
SALLIE SHANNON CHAPMAN,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
FERTITTA ENTERTAINMENT, INC., et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:15-cv-01944-JAD-GWF
ORDER
11
12
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ failure to file a joint pretrial order required by
13
LR 26-1(b)(5). The Stipulation and Order to Extend Dispositive Motion Deadline (ECF No. 35) filed
14
Oc, required the parties to file a joint pretrial order required by LR 26-1(e)(5) no later than December
15
9, 2016, or 30 days after a decision on the dispositive motions. A motion for summary judgment
16
(ECF No. 36) was decided on August 31, 2017, in which case the date for filing the Joint Pretrial
17
Order was suspended until 30 days after the decision. There are no further dispositive motions
18
pending. To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly,
19
20
IT IS ORDERED that
1.
Counsel for the parties shall file a joint pretrial order which fully complies with
21
the requirements of LR 16-3 and LR 16-4 no later than November 20, 2017.
22
Failure to timely comply will result in the imposition of sanctions up to and
23
including a recommendation to the District Judge that the complaint be
24
dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
25
26
27
2.
The disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) and any objections thereto
shall be included in the pretrial order.
DATED this 13th day of November, 2017.
28
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?