Chapman v. Fertitta Entertainment Inc., et al

Filing 52

ORDER that counsel for the parties shall file a Proposed Joint Pretrial Order by 11/20/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 11/13/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 7 8 9 10 SALLIE SHANNON CHAPMAN, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) FERTITTA ENTERTAINMENT, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:15-cv-01944-JAD-GWF ORDER 11 12 This matter is before the Court on the parties’ failure to file a joint pretrial order required by 13 LR 26-1(b)(5). The Stipulation and Order to Extend Dispositive Motion Deadline (ECF No. 35) filed 14 Oc, required the parties to file a joint pretrial order required by LR 26-1(e)(5) no later than December 15 9, 2016, or 30 days after a decision on the dispositive motions. A motion for summary judgment 16 (ECF No. 36) was decided on August 31, 2017, in which case the date for filing the Joint Pretrial 17 Order was suspended until 30 days after the decision. There are no further dispositive motions 18 pending. To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly, 19 20 IT IS ORDERED that 1. Counsel for the parties shall file a joint pretrial order which fully complies with 21 the requirements of LR 16-3 and LR 16-4 no later than November 20, 2017. 22 Failure to timely comply will result in the imposition of sanctions up to and 23 including a recommendation to the District Judge that the complaint be 24 dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 26 27 2. The disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) and any objections thereto shall be included in the pretrial order. DATED this 13th day of November, 2017. 28 ______________________________________ GEORGE FOLEY, JR. United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?