McJunkin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Filing 49

ORDER that 34 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.'s Motion in Limine No. 1 is DENIED; 35 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.'s Motion in Limine No. 2 is DENIED; 36 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.'s Motion in Limine No. 3 is DENIED; 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.'s Motions in Limine Nos. 4, 5, 6, and 7, are GRANTED. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 4/28/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9
10

ANGIE MARIE MCJUNKIN,

11

Plaintiff,

12

v.

13

Case No. 2:15-cv-1966-LDG (PAL)

WAL-MART STORES, INC,

14

ORDER

Defendant.

15
16

For good cause shown,

17

THE COURT ORDERS that Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.’s Motion in Limine No.

18

1 to Strike Plaintiff’s Expert; or, in the Alternative, to Preclude Unfounded Opinions offered

19

by Plaintiffs [sic] Expert (ECF No. 34) is DENIED;

20

THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.’s Motion in

21

Limine No. 2 to Preclude Non-retained Experts or Experts Who Have Not Prepared a

22

Report, from Testifying about Causation, or Any Opinions Outside of Those Set Forth in

23

Their Treatment Records (ECF No. 35) is DENIED;

24

THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.’s Motion in

25

Limine No. 3 to Exclude the Contents of Plaintiff’s Medical Records other than Statements

26

1

Made by Plaintiff for Purposes of Diagnosis or Treatment, as Inadmissible Hearsay (ECF

2

No. 36) is DENIED;

3

THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.’s Motions

4

in Limine Nos. 4, 5, 6, and 7 (ECF Nos. 37-40), as to which Plaintiff Angie McJunkin has

5

filed non-responses (ECF No. 47), are GRANTED.

6
7
8

DATED this ______ day of April, 2017.

9
10

Lloyd D. George
United States District Judge

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2