Tidmarsh v. Nye County Sheriff's Department et al

Filing 104

ORDER Granting 103 Stipulation to Extend Plaintiff's Response re 100 Bill of Costs. ( Responses due by 7/20/2017.) Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 7/17/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
Case 2:15-cv-01970-APG-NJK Document 103 Filed 07/17/17 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 CAL J. POTTER, III, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 1988 POTTER LAW OFFICES 1125 Shadow Lane Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 Ph: (702) 385-1954 Fax: (702) 385-9081 cpotter@potterlawoffices.com 5 6 7 8 9 C. CONRAD CLAUS, ESQ. THE LAW OFFICES OF C. CONRAD CLAUS Nevada Bar No. 6601 816 E. Ogden Las Vegas, NV 89101 Ph: (702) 384-4927 Fax: (702) 385-4927 conrad@lawiswar.com Attorneys for Plaintiff 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 WILLIAM TIDMARSH, CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-01970-APG-NJK Plaintiff, vs. NYE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, a political subdivision of Nye County, State of Nevada, NYE COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Nevada, DAVID BORUCHOWITZ, individually, ANTHONY DE MEO, individually and in his capacity as Sheriff of Nye County, RICK MARSHALL, individually and in his capacity as Assistant Sheriff Nye County, RICK MEDINA, Assistant Deputy, individually, BRIAN JONAS, Deputy, individually, POLICE OFFICER DOES 1-100, JOHN DOES 1 through 100,inclusive; and ROE CORPORATIONS, 1 through 100, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT NYE COUNTY, ANTHONY DEMEO, RICK MARSHALL, MARK MEDINA AND BRIAN JONAS’ BILL OF COSTS [ECF 100] 23 Defendants. 24 COMES NOW, the above-referenced parties, by and through their undersigned counsel 25 of record, and hereby agree, jointly stipulate that the Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant Nye 26 County, Nye County, Anthony DeMeo, Rick Marshall, Mark Medina and Brian Jonas’ Bill of 27 Costs [ECF 100] filed on July 3, 2017, currently due July 17, 2017, be extended an additional 28 1 Case 2:15-cv-01970-APG-NJK Document 103 Filed 07/17/17 Page 2 of 2 1 2 three (3) days up to and including Thursday, July 20, 2017. The reason for this request is that Plaintiff’s counsel has numerous conflicting deadlines, 3 specifically, counsel for Plaintiff have been preparing for multiple depositions in Donatell v. City 4 of Las Vegas, et al., 2:15-cv-03224-RFB-NJK, preparing for a settlement conference in 5 Landeros, et al. v. LVMPD, 2:14-cv-01525-JCM-CWH, set for July 13, 2017, and preparing for a 6 mediation hearing in Goforth v. NV Energy, A-14-695310-C, set for July 21, 2017. Plaintiffs’ 7 counsel is also preparing for trial in Swigers v. Mandalay Bay Corp., et al. A-14-701182-C, set to 8 commence on July 31, 2017, as well as numerous substantive motions and responses and other 9 general appearances and deadlines. In addition to the conflicting deadlines, counsel for the 10 Plaintiff has two eye surgeries scheduled in the next two weeks. 11 This request for extension is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay. 12 WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that the Response be extended an 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 additional three (3) days up to and including Thursday, July 20, 2017. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT. DATED this 17th day of July, 2017. DATED this 17th day of July, 2017. POTTER LAW OFFICES MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING By /s/ Cal J. Potter, III, Esq. CAL J. POTTER, III, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 1988 C. J. POTTER, IV, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13225 1125 Shadow Lane Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 Attorney for Plaintiff By /s/ Kathleen A. Wilde, Esq. CRAIG R. ANDERSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6882 KATHLEEN A. WILDE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12522 10001 Park Run Drive Las Vegas, NV 89145 Attorneys for Nye County, Anthony DeMeo, Rick Marshall, Mark Medina and Brian Jonas 22 23 24 ORDER 25 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7/17/2017 _______________ DATED ______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?