Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ascenergy LLC et al
Filing
85
FINAL JUDGMENT as to Defendant Ascenergy LLC, Defendant Joseph Gabaldon, and Relief Defendant Alanah Energy, LLC (see Order for the amount of disgorgement, pre-judgment interest, and civil penalties). Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 5/23/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Case 2:15-cv-01974-GMN-PAL Document 84-2 Filed 05/22/17 Page 1 of 7
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
Case No.: 2:15-cv-01974-GMN-PAL
Plaintiff,
vs.
ASCENERGY LLC and
JOSEPH (a/k/a JOEY) GABALDON,
AGREED FINAL JUDGMENT AS
TO DEFENDANT ASCENERGY
LLC, DEFENDANT JOSEPH (A/K/A
JOEY) GABALDON, AND RELIEF
DEFENDANT ALANAH
ENERGY, LLC
Defendants,
PYCKL LLC and ALANAH
ENERGY, LLC,
Relief Defendants.
14
15
16
On June 21, 2016, the Court entered an Agreed Judgment against Defendant Ascenergy
LLC (“Ascenergy”), Defendant Joseph (a/k/a Joey) Gabaldon (“Gabaldon”), and Relief
17
Defendant Alanah Energy, LLC (“Alanah,” and collectively, “Defendants”). ECF No. 63. The
18
19
20
21
Agreed Judgment contemplates that a Final Judgment would subsequently be entered against
Defendants setting the amount of disgorgement, pre-judgment interest, and civil penalties.
Defendants have entered general appearances, consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over
22
them and the subject matter of this action, consented to entry of this Final Judgment without
23
admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to jurisdiction and except as
24
otherwise provided herein in paragraph V); waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and
25
waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment:
26
27
28
Case 2:15-cv-01974-GMN-PAL Document 84-2 Filed 05/22/17 Page 2 of 7
I.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant Ascenergy
and Defendant Gabaldon are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or
indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15
U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any
means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any
national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security:
(a)
to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;
(b)
to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact
necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances
under which they were made, not misleading; or
(c)
to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would
operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who
receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant
Ascenergy’s and/or Defendant Gabaldon’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys;
and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant Ascenergy and/or
Defendant Gabaldon or with anyone described in (a).
II.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant
Ascenergy and Defendant Gabaldon are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating
Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the
2
Case 2:15-cv-01974-GMN-PAL Document 84-2 Filed 05/22/17 Page 3 of 7
offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or
communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly:
(a)
to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;
(b)
to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact
or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading;
or
(c)
to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or
would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who
receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant
Ascenergy’s and/or Defendant Gabaldon’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys;
and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant Ascenergy and/or
Defendant Gabaldon or with anyone described in (a).
III.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:
Defendants Gabaldon and Defendant Ascenergy are jointly and severally liable for
disgorgement of $5,112,473, representing profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the
Complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $197,217.
Relief Defendant Alanah is liable for disgorgement of $103,890, representing profits
gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, together with prejudgment interest
thereon in the amount of $4,670.
3
Case 2:15-cv-01974-GMN-PAL Document 84-2 Filed 05/22/17 Page 4 of 7
Defendant Gabaldon and Defendant Ascenergy shall have their disgorgement obligation
reduced by the amount of any disgorgement amounts that the Commission actually collects from
Relief Defendant Pyckl LLC or its owners, managers, members, or affiliates or from Relief
Defendant Alanah in this matter, including any amounts collected from escrow accounts
established on their behalf. Defendant Gabaldon and Defendant Ascenergy shall also have their
disgorgement obligation reduced by and to the extent any amount of the approximately $517,278
of investor funds previously seized by the Federal Bureau of Investigation is finally forfeited or
released thereto.
Defendant Gabaldon is further liable for a civil penalty in the amount of $320,000
pursuant to Section 20(d) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(d)] and Section 21(d)(3) of the
Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3)].
Defendant Ascenergy is further liable for a civil penalty in the amount of $1,550,000
pursuant to Section 20(d) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(d)] and Section 21(d)(3) of the
Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3)].
Defendants shall satisfy these obligations by paying all amounts to the Securities and
Exchange Commission within 14 days after entry of this Final Judgment. Any funds in the
accounts of Defendant Gabaldon, Defendant Ascenergy, or Relief Defendant Alanah subject to
the Court’s Asset Freeze [ECF No. 14] may be released towards payment of the obligations set
forth herein.
Defendants may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will provide
detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request. Payment may also be made directly
from a bank account via Pay.gov through the SEC website
at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm. Defendants may also pay by certified check, bank
4
Case 2:15-cv-01974-GMN-PAL Document 84-2 Filed 05/22/17 Page 5 of 7
cashier’s check, or United States postal money order payable to the Securities and Exchange
Commission, which shall be delivered or mailed to
Enterprise Services Center
Accounts Receivable Branch
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying the case title, civil action number, and name of
this Court; the respective Defendant’s name; and specifying that payment is made pursuant to
this Final Judgment.
Defendants shall simultaneously transmit photocopies of evidence of payment and case
identifying information to the Commission’s counsel in this action. By making this payment,
Defendants relinquishes all legal and equitable right, title, and interest in such funds and no part
of the funds shall be returned to Defendants.
The Commission may enforce the Court’s judgment for disgorgement and prejudgment
interest by moving for civil contempt (and/or through other collection procedures authorized by
law) at any time after 14 days following entry of this Final Judgment. Defendants shall pay post
judgment interest on any delinquent amounts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961.
The Commission shall hold the funds (collectively, the “Fund”) and may propose a plan
to distribute the Fund subject to the Court’s approval. Such a plan may provide that the Fund
shall be distributed pursuant to the Fair Fund provisions of Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the administration of any distribution of the
Fund. If the Commission staff determines that the Fund will not be distributed, the Commission
shall send the funds paid pursuant to this Final Judgment to the United States Treasury.
Regardless of whether any such Fair Fund distribution is made, amounts ordered to be
paid as civil penalties pursuant to this Final Judgment shall be treated as penalties paid to the
government for all purposes, including all tax purposes. To preserve the deterrent effect of the
5
Case 2:15-cv-01974-GMN-PAL Document 84-2 Filed 05/22/17 Page 6 of 7
civil penalty, Defendant Ascenergy and Defendant Gabaldon shall not, after offset or reduction
of any award of compensatory damages in any Related Investor Action based on their payment
of disgorgement in this action, argue that they are entitled to, nor shall Defendant Ascenergy or
Defendant Gabaldon further benefit by, offset or reduction of such compensatory damages award
by the amount of any part of Defendant Ascenergy’s or Defendant Gabaldon’s payment of a civil
penalty in this action (“Penalty Offset”). If the court in any Related Investor Action grants such
a Penalty Offset, the Defendant receiving the Penalty Offset shall, within 30 days after entry of a
final order granting the Penalty Offset, notify the Commission’s counsel in this action and pay
the amount of the Penalty Offset to the United States Treasury or to a Fair Fund, as the
Commission directs. Such a payment shall not be deemed an additional civil penalty and shall
not be deemed to change the amount of the civil penalty imposed in this Final Judgment. For
purposes of this paragraph, a “Related Investor Action” means a private damages action brought
against a Defendant by or on behalf of one or more investors based on substantially the same
facts as alleged in the Complaint in this action.
IV.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consents
Defendants executed in connection with this Final Judgment are incorporated herein with the
same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant Ascenergy, Defendant
Gabaldon, and Relief Defendant Alanah shall comply with all of the undertakings and
agreements set forth therein.
V.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, solely for purposes of
exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523, the
6
Case 2:15-cv-01974-GMN-PAL Document 84-2 Filed 05/22/17 Page 7 of 7
allegations in the complaint are true and admitted by Defendant Gabaldon, and further, any debt
for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant
Gabaldon under this Final Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or
settlement agreement entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by
Defendant Gabaldon of the federal securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such
laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(19).
VI.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain
jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment.
VII.
There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice.
IT IS SO ORDERED:
________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Judge
23
DATED this ___ day of May, 2017.
7
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?