Kraja v. Bellagio, LLC et al

Filing 34

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that counsel shall comply with the requirements of Local Rule 10-5(b), the Ninth Circuits decision in Kamakana, 447 F.3d 1172, and the procedures outlined above, with respect to any documents filed under seal. To the extent an y aspect of the stipulated protective order may conflict with this order or Local Rule 10-5(b), that aspect of the stipulated protective order is hereby superseded with this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/3/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 ANDI KRAJA, 11 12 Plaintiff(s), 13 vs. 14 BELLAGIO, LLC, et al., 15 Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:15-cv-01983-APG-NJK ORDER (Docket No. 31) 16 Pending before the Court is a Stipulated Protective Order, Docket No. 31, which the Court 17 approved to facilitate discovery in this case. This order reminds counsel that there is a presumption of 18 public access to judicial files and records. A party seeking to file a confidential document under seal 19 must file a motion to seal and must comply with the Ninth Circuit’s directives in Kamakana v. City and 20 County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006). 21 The Court has adopted electronic filing procedures, and with a few exceptions not applicable 22 here, the Clerk of the Court no longer maintains paper records. Special Order 109 requires the Clerk of 23 the Court to maintain the official files for all cases filed on or after November 7, 2005, in electronic 24 form. The electronic record constitutes the official record of the court. Attorneys must file documents 25 under seal using the Court’s electronic filing procedures. See Local Rule 10-5(b). That rule provides: 26 27 28 Unless otherwise permitted by statute, rule or prior Court order, papers filed with the Court under seal shall be accompanied by a motion for leave to file those documents under seal, and shall be filed in accordance with the Court’s electronic filing procedures. If papers are filed under seal pursuant to prior 1 Court order, the papers shall bear the following notation on the first page, directly under the case number: “FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER DATED __________.” All papers filed under seal will remain sealed until such time as the Court may deny the motion to seal or enter an order to unseal them, or the documents are unsealed pursuant to Local Rule. 2 3 4 Id. Documents filed under seal are not accessible to the public. 5 The Court has approved the blanket protective order to facilitate discovery exchanges. But there 6 has been no showing, and the Court has not found, that any specific documents are secret or 7 confidential. The parties have not provided specific facts supported by declarations or concrete 8 examples to establish that a protective order is required to protect any specific trade secret or other 9 confidential information pursuant to Rule 26(c) or that disclosure would cause an identifiable and 10 significant harm. The Ninth Circuit has held that there is a presumption of public access to judicial files 11 and records, and that parties seeking to maintain the confidentiality of documents attached to 12 nondispositive motions must show good cause exists to overcome the presumption of public access. 13 See Kamakana 447 F.3d at 1179. Parties seeking to maintain the secrecy of documents attached to 14 dispositive motions must show compelling reasons sufficient to overcome the presumption of public 15 access. Id. at 1180.1 All motions to seal must address the applicable standard and explain why that 16 standard has been met. The fact that a court has entered a blanket stipulated protective order and that 17 a party has designated a document as confidential pursuant to that protective order does not, standing 18 alone, establish sufficient grounds to seal a filed document. See Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 19 331 F.3d 1122, 1133 (9th Cir. 2003); see also Beckman Indus., Inc. v. Int’l Ins. Co., 966 F.2d 470, 476 20 (9th Cir. 1992). 21 If the sole ground for a motion to seal is that the opposing party (or non-party) has designated 22 a document as subject to protection pursuant to the stipulated protective order, the movant must notify 23 the opposing party (or non-party) at least seven days prior to filing the designated document. The 24 designating party must then make a good faith determination if the relevant standard for sealing is met. 25 26 27 28 1 The Ninth Circuit has clarified that the terms “dispositive” and “nondispositive” are not intended to be mechanical classifications. See Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1098 (9th Cir. 2016). Instead, determining the applicable standard is premised on “whether the motion at issue is more than tangentially related to the underlying cause of action.” Id. at 1099. 2 1 To the extent the designating party does not believe the relevant standard for sealing can be met, it shall 2 indicate that the document may be filed publicly no later than four days after receiving notice of the 3 intended filing. To the extent the designating party believes the relevant standard for sealing can be 4 met, it shall provide a declaration supporting that assertion no later than four days after receiving notice 5 of the intended filing. The filing party shall then attach that declaration to its motion to seal the 6 designated material. If the designating party fails to provide such a declaration in support of the motion 7 to seal, the filing party shall file a motion to seal so indicating and the Court may order the document 8 filed in the public record.2 9 IT IS ORDERED that counsel shall comply with the requirements of Local Rule 10-5(b), the 10 Ninth Circuit’s decision in Kamakana, 447 F.3d 1172, and the procedures outlined above, with respect 11 to any documents filed under seal. To the extent any aspect of the stipulated protective order may 12 conflict with this order or Local Rule 10-5(b), that aspect of the stipulated protective order is hereby 13 superseded with this order. 14 DATED: March 3, 2016 15 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 In the event of an emergency motion, the above procedures shall not apply. Instead, the movant shall file a motion to seal and the designating party shall file a declaration in support of that motion to seal within three days of its filing. If the designating party fails to timely file such a declaration, the Court may order the document filed in the public record. 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?