Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Giavanna Homeowners Association et al
Filing
84
ORDER that by March 1, 2017, Plaintiff Nationstar Mortgage LLC must submit a proposed order reflecting the court's findings at the hearing on November 30, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 2/15/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
GIAVANNA HOMEOWNERS
)
ASSOCIATION, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:15-cv-01992-LDG-CWH
ORDER
13
On November 30, 2016, the court held a hearing regarding Plaintiff Nationstar Mortgage
14
LLC’s Emergency Motion for Protection from its 30(b)(6) Deposition and Motion for Sanctions
15
(ECF No. 59). (Mins. of Proceedings (ECF No. 75).) The court stated that the issues in the motion
16
are identical to the issues in the motion for protective order and sanctions (ECF No. 41) filed in
17
CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Mission Hills Homeowners Association, et al., Case No. 2:16-cv-00374-JCM-
18
CWH, which the court granted in part and denied in part at a hearing on November 15, 2016 (ECF
19
No. 49). Given that the issues and findings were identical, the court ordered Plaintiff to submit a
20
proposed order reflecting those findings in this case. (Mins. of Proceedings (ECF No. 75).) In
21
reviewing the docket, it has come to the court’s attention that Plaintiff has not yet submitted the
22
proposed order.
23
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that by March 1, 2017, Plaintiff Nationstar Mortgage LLC
24
must submit a proposed order reflecting the court’s findings at the hearing on November 30, 2016,
25
and in accordance with Local Rule 7-2(f).
26
DATED: February 15, 2017
27
28
______________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?