Gallaway v. Barclays Bank Delaware

Filing 12

ORDER Granting 11 Stipulation to further Stay all Proceedings (Second Request). Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/20/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)

Download PDF
5 RICK D. ROSKELLEY, ESQ., Bar # 3192 ROGER L. GRANDGENETT II, ESQ., Bar # 6323 MONTGOMERY Y. PAEK, ESQ., Bar # 10176 KATHRYN B. BLAKEY, ESQ., Bar # 12701 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 3960 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 300 Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937 Telephone: 702.862.8800 Fax No.: 702.862.8811 6 Attorneys for Defendant 1 2 3 4 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 MICHELLE GALLAWAY, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 12 13 BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, STIPULATION TO FURTHER STAY ALL PROCEEDINGS vs. 14 Case No. 2:15-cv-02003-APG-GWF 15 16 SECOND REQUEST ORDER Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiff Michelle Gallaway (“Plaintiff”), by and through her counsel of record, and 19 Defendant Barclays Bank Delaware (“Defendant”), by and through its counsel of record, submit 20 the below stipulation to further stay all proceedings in the above-captioned matter. 21 On November 9, 2015, the Court signed a joint stipulation filed by the Parties (Doc. 9) to 22 stay all proceeding until February 15, 2016, to grant the Parties time to participate in a mediation 23 with mediator David Rottman. Based upon schedules and availability of the Parties and Mr. 24 Rottman, the Parties have scheduled the mediation with Mr. Rottman for March 17, 2016. 25 Accordingly, to allow the Parties adequate time to engage in meaningful global settlement 26 discussions to fully and finally resolve this dispute, pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 26-4, the 27 Parties seek to further stay all proceedings in this matter to accommodate the scheduled mediation 28 date of March 17, 2016. 1 The Parties have not engaged in any discovery; however, they are in the process of 2 exchanging information which will be beneficial to reaching a global settlement. The Parties 3 therefore stipulate and agree that: 1. 4 5 The above-captioned dispute shall be stayed from November 9, 2015, until March 25, 2016 (the “Stay Period”); 2. 6 If the Parties do not resolve this dispute during the Stay Period and do not request 7 an additional stay from the Court to continue settlement negotiation, the Parties agree that the 8 following schedule shall be implemented: a. 9 10 Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint, if any, fourteen (14) calendar days after the end of the Stay Period; b. 11 The Parties shall file a proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order 12 within fourteen (14) calendar days after the filing of any amended complaint or the lifting of the 13 stay, whichever is later; 3. 14 The statute of limitations shall be tolled commencing on November 9, 2015, and 15 ending on the last day of the Stay Period (or any additional stay period) such that measurement of 16 the statute of limitations applicable to any claim asserted under the Fair Labor Standards Act shall 17 exclude the Stay Period; 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// -2- 1 4. The Parties reserve all rights and defenses to which they are entitled as of the first 2 day of the Stay Period and this stipulation does not effect and is not intended to effect a waiver of 3 any such right or defense. 4 Dated this19th day of January, 2016. 5 THIERMAN LAW FIRM, P.C. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. /s/ Joshua D. Buck Mark R. Thierman, Bar # 8285 Joshua D. Buck, Bar # 12187 7287 Lakeside Drive Reno, Nevada 89511 /s/ Rick Roskelley Rick Roskelley, Bar No. 3192 Roger L. Grandgenett II, Montgomery Y. Paek, Kathryn B. Blakey, 3960 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 300 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ORDER 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED January 20 , 2016. 16 17 United States District/Magistrate Judge United States District Judge 18 Firmwide:138138345.1 067242.1012 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?