Schaefer v. Hundley et al
ORDER Re: 50 Ex Parte Motion., Responses due by 11/28/2017. Replies due by 12/5/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 11/14/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
J. MICHAEL SCHAEFER,
Before the court is Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion to Strike 10/16/17 Tardy Answer to FAC (ECF No.
50). Since this motion is filed as ex-parte, Defendant received no notification of the filing of instant
motion through CM/ECF. Schaefer has not provided the court with any reason to grant the relief on an ex
Pursuant to Local Rule IA 7-2(b), neither party nor an attorney for any party may make an ex parte
communication with the court except as specifically permitted by the local rules or the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure. Here, Schaefer has not given good cause or any compelling reason why the instant
motion was submitted to the Court without notice to defendant.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any opposition to Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion to Strike 10/16/17
Tardy Answer to FAC (ECF No. 50) must be filed on or before November 28, 2017. The reply in support
of Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion to Strike 10/16/17 Tardy Answer to FAC (ECF No. 50) is due December 5,
The Clerk of Court is directed to remove the ex parte status on Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion to Strike
10/16/17 Tardy Answer to FAC (ECF No. 50).
DATED this 14th day of November, 2017.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?