Drury v. Barcelona Holdings, LLC et al
ORDER re 52 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that 52 the parties' proposed discovery plan is DENIED without prejudice. The parties must submit a revised discovery plan and scheduling order by 10/21/16. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 10/13/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
JAMES ROBERT DRURY,
BARCELONA HOLDINGS, et al.,
Case No. 2:15-cv-02048-JCM-CWH
Presently before the court is Plaintiff and Defendant’s proposed discovery plan (ECF No. 52),
filed on October 11, 2016. Under Local Rule 26-1(a), the parties must submit to the court a
discovery plan and scheduling order within fourteen days of their Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference.
The parties have submitted a discovery plan, but have not submitted a scheduling order. The parties’
proposal also fails to conform to a number of provisions of Local Rule 26-1. The parties are advised
to read Local Rule 26-1 in its entirety, and submit a revised discovery plan and scheduling order.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties’ proposed discovery plan (ECF No. 52) is
DENIED without prejudice. The parties must submit a revised discovery plan and scheduling order
by October 21, 2016.
DATED: October 13, 2016.
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?