Drury v. Barcelona Holdings, LLC et al

Filing 53

ORDER re 52 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that 52 the parties' proposed discovery plan is DENIED without prejudice. The parties must submit a revised discovery plan and scheduling order by 10/21/16. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 10/13/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

JAMES ROBERT DRURY,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
BARCELONA HOLDINGS, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
_______________________________________ )

Case No. 2:15-cv-02048-JCM-CWH

ORDER

Presently before the court is Plaintiff and Defendant’s proposed discovery plan (ECF No. 52),

11

filed on October 11, 2016. Under Local Rule 26-1(a), the parties must submit to the court a

12

discovery plan and scheduling order within fourteen days of their Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference.

13

The parties have submitted a discovery plan, but have not submitted a scheduling order. The parties’

14

proposal also fails to conform to a number of provisions of Local Rule 26-1. The parties are advised

15

to read Local Rule 26-1 in its entirety, and submit a revised discovery plan and scheduling order.

16

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties’ proposed discovery plan (ECF No. 52) is

17

DENIED without prejudice. The parties must submit a revised discovery plan and scheduling order

18

by October 21, 2016.

19

DATED: October 13, 2016.

20
21

_________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1