Drury v. Barcelona Holdings, LLC et al

Filing 92

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 89 Plaintiff's motion for recording is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 2/23/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

4
5
6
7
8
9
10

JAMES ROBERT DRURY,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
BARCELONA HOLDINGS, LLC, et al,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)

11

Case No. 2:15-cv-02048-CWH
ORDER

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff James Robert Drury’s motion for copy of recording

12

(ECF No. 89), filed on February 22, 2017. Plaintiff requests that the Court provide him with a

13

recording of the hearing held held on January 31, 2017 (ECF No. 82). Plaintiff requests the Court

14

provide this recording without charge on the grounds that he is proceeding in forma pauperis in this

15

case.
After granting permission for a party to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court may direct

16
17

payment by the United States for providing records or transcripts only when such records are

18

required for proceedings in another court. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(c). Granting in forma pauperis status

19

“does not relieve the applicant of the responsibility to pay the expenses of litigation that are not

20

covered by 28 U.S.C. § 1915.” LSR 1-7.

21

Here, the recording of the hearing has not been required by this or any other court. Plaintiff

22

does not provide the Court with any legal authority indicating that he is entitled to the recordings

23

free of charge or that the provisions of § 1915 and Local Special Rule 1-7 are inapplicable in this

24

case. The Court will therefore deny Plaintiff’s motion, without prejudice.

25

Should Plaintiff wish to order a recording of the hearing, he may submit a completed form

26

AO 436 to the Court. The form may be downloaded from the “Files” section of the Court’s

27

website, and submitted via e-mail to: [e-mail]. Plaintiff will be

28

responsible for whatever fees are associated.
//

1
2
3
4
5

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for recording (ECF No. 89) is
DENIED without prejudice.
DATED: February 23, 2017.
______________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2