Drury v. Barcelona Holdings, LLC et al

Filing 99

ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that 95 , 96 Plaintiff's motions for extension are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for any reply to 78 Plaintiff's partial motion for summary judgment is 3/27/17. IT IS FURTHER ORDE RED that the deadline for any reply to 83 Plaintiff's motion for declaratory judgment is 3/27/17. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for any response to 90 Defendant's motion for summary judgment is 4/3/17. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk must STRIKE 97 Plaintiff's duplicate motion for extension. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 3/21/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

ROBERT DRURY,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
BARCELONA HOLDINGS, LLC, et al,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
_______________________________________ )

10
11

Case No. 2:15-cv-02048-JCM-CWH

ORDER

Presently before the Court are pro se Plaintiff Robert Drury’s motions to extend time (ECF
Nos. 95, 96 and 97), filed on March 20 and 21, 2017. Defendants have not filed a response.

12

Plaintiff requests extensions to various deadlines to the pending dispositive motions in this

13

case. As a preliminary matter, ECF No. 97 appears to be a duplicate of ECF No. 96 filed in error, so

14

the Court will strike the motion. As for the other motions, in ECF No. 95 Plaintiff represents that he

15

misunderstood the deadline for his response to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No.

16

90). In ECF No. 96, Plaintiff represents that he is having some personal issues making it difficult to

17

file a timely reply in support of his motion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 78).

18

The Court also notes that Plaintiff has not filed a reply in support of his motion for

19

declaratory judgment (ECF No. 83). In the interest of justice and judicial economy, the Court will

20

construe Plaintiff’s filings liberally as motions to extend the deadlines to the motion for declaratory

21

judgment as well. Given the limited duration of the requested extensions, and Plaintiff’s generally

22

prompt participation in litigation, the Court will grant the motions.

23

//

24

//

25

//

26

//

27

//

28

1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motions for extension (ECF Nos. 95 and 96)
are GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for any reply to Plaintiff’s partial motion for
summary judgment (ECF No. 78) is March 27, 2017.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for any reply to Plaintiff’s motion for
declaratory judgment (ECF No. 83) is March 27, 2017.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for any response to Defendant’s motion for
summary judgment (ECF No. 90) is April 3, 2017.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk must STRIKE Plaintiff’s duplicate motion for
extension (ECF No. 97).

11
12

DATED: March 21, 2017.

13
14

_________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2