Abbey Dental Center v. Consumer Opinion LLC
Filing
33
ORDER Granting 32 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request) re 30 Second MOTION to Dismiss and 31 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's Responses due by 1/29/2017. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 12/21/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Case 2:15-cv-02069-GMN-PAL Document 32 Filed 12/15/16 Page 1 of 3
1 Marc J. Randazza (NV Bar No. 12265)
Alex J. Shepard (NV Bar No. 13582)
2 RANDAZZA LEGAL GROUP, PLLC
4035 S. El Capitan Way
3 Las Vegas, NV 89147
Telephone: 702-420-2001
4 Facsimile: 305-437-7662
ecf@randazza.com
5 Attorneys for Defendant,
Consumer Opinion LLC
6
Ismail Amin, Esq. (NV Bar No. 9343)
7 Lawrence Kulp, Esq. (NV Bar No. 7411)
Breane Stryker, Esq. (NV Bar No. 13594)
8 THE AMIN LAW GROUP, NV., LTD.
3753 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 200
9 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: (702) 990-3583
10 Facsimile: (702) 441-2488
11 Attorneys for Plaintiff,
Abbey Dental Center, Inc.
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
13
Case No.: 2:15-cv-02069-GMN-PAL
14 ABBEY DENTAL CENTER, INC.,
a Nevada Corporation,
STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED)
15
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR
PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO
16
v.
DEFENDANT’S SECOND SPECIAL
MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED
17
CONSUMER OPINION LLC, a Nevada
COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO NRS 41.660
Limited liability company; DOES 1-10; and AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY
18
ROE ENTITIES 1-10, inclusive,
JUDGMENT
19
Defendants.
(First Request)
20
As further detailed hereinafter, Defendant CONSUMER OPINION LLC (“Defendant
21
Consumer Opinion”) filed a Second Special Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff ABBEY DENTAL
22
CENTER, INC. (“Plaintiff Abbey Dental”)’s First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 28) in this
23
matter on or about December 9, 2016. (ECF Nos. 30, 31). The Parties, by and through their
24
respective, undersigned counsel, do hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
25
1.
On October 27, 2015, Plaintiff Abbey Dental filed its Complaint against Defendant
26
Consumer Opinion. (ECF No. 1).
27
-1Stipulation and (Proposed) Order to Extend Time
2:15-cv-02069-GMN-PAL
Case 2:15-cv-02069-GMN-PAL Document 32 Filed 12/15/16 Page 2 of 3
1
2.
On January 6, 2016, Defendant Consumer Opinion informed Plaintiff Abbey
2 Dental that it would be seeking a dismissal via an Anti-SLAPP motion in this case. (ECF No.
3 31-2).
4
3.
After eight stipulations to extend time, Defendant Consumer Opinion filed its
5 Special Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to NRS 41.660 and Motion for Summary Judgment on
6 December 7, 2016. (ECF Nos. 25 & 27).
7
4.
Plaintiff Abbey Dental responded to Defendant’s Motion the next day by filing its
8 First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 28).
9
5.
On December 9, 2016, Defendant Consumer Opinion responded to Plaintiff’s First
10 Amended Complaint by filing its Second Special Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to NRS 41.660 and
11 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF Nos. 30 & 31).
12
6.
Since Defendant’s Second Anti-SLAPP Motion was filed, the Parties have been in
13 cordial discussions regarding possible discovery that the Plaintiff may wish for prior to responding
14 to the pending Anti-SLAPP Motion.
15
7.
The Parties are desirous of relieving the Court of the necessity of contemplating
16 their rights under NRS 41.660(4) or Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d), and believe that they can resolve the
17 issue informally.
18
8.
However, in order to do so, Plaintiff Abbey Dental wishes to provide Defendant
19 Consumer Opinion with its proposed discovery requests. Upon receiving them, the Parties will
20 meet and confer as to the propriety of the requests.
21
9.
Plaintiff Abbey Dental requires approximately one week in which to produce the
22 discovery requests to Defendant Consumer Opinion, and the Parties expect to spend a few days
23 meeting and conferring on the limitation of the requests.
24
10.
Accordingly, the Parties jointly stipulate to an extension of the current response
25 date to the Anti-SLAPP Motion by 30 days; Plaintiff Abbey Dental’s deadline to respond to
26 Defendant Consumer Opinion’s Second Special Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to NRS 41.660 and
27
-2Stipulation and (Proposed) Order to Extend Time
2:15-cv-02069-GMN-PAL
Case 2:15-cv-02069-GMN-PAL Document 32 Filed 12/15/16 Page 3 of 3
1 Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 30 & 31) is extended from December 30, 2016 to
2 January 29, 2017.
3
11.
The Parties also stipulate that there is good cause for Plaintiff, Abbey Dental, to
4 seek discovery from third parties immediately.
5
12.
This is the first stipulation for an extension of time for Plaintiff Abbey Dental to
6 respond to Defendant Consumer Opinon’s Second Special Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to NRS
7 41.660 and Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 30 & 31).
8
13.
This extension will either permit the Parties to solve any discovery issues on their
9 own, without the need for Court intervention, or it will allow the Parties to significantly narrow
10 the issues so that any Court intervention is more limited in nature.
11 Dated this 15th day of December, 2016.
12
RANDAZZA LEGAL GROUP, PLLC
13
/s/ Marc J. Randazza
Marc J. Randazza (NV Bar No. 12265)
Alex J. Shepard (NV Bar No. 13582)
4035 S. El Capitan Way
Las Vegas, NV 89147
Attorneys for Defendant,
Consumer Opinion LLC
14
15
16
17
18
THE AMIN LAW GROUP, NV., LTD.
22
/s/ Ismail Amin
Ismail Amin, Esq. (NV Bar No. 9343)
Lawrence Kulp, Esq. (NV Bar No. 7411)
Breane Stryker, Esq. (NV Bar No. 13594)
3960 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 500
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
Abbey Dental Center, Inc.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
21
24
25
___________________________________
26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
Dated: December 21, 2016
__________________
-3Stipulation and (Proposed) Order to Extend Time
2:15-cv-02069-GMN-PAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?