Tagle v. State of Nevada et al
Filing
45
ORDER denying 44 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/14/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
VICTOR TAGLE,
8
9
10
Case No. 2:15-CV-2082 JCM (VCF)
Plaintiff(s),
ORDER
v.
STATE OF NEVADA,
11
Defendant(s).
12
13
14
Presently before the court is pro se plaintiff Victor Tagle’s objection to Magistrate Judge
Ferenbach’s May 22, 2017, order (ECF No. 43). (ECF No. 44).
15
Plaintiff alleges that he has been “targeted again due to discrimination and abuse of
16
discretion of the court” and that “Judge Ferenbach’s discriminatory, wrongful decision’s goes [sic]
17
long back on plaintiff’s case, showing the prejudice of the court.” (Id.). Plaintiff requests “the
18
change of court’s [sic] officials.” (Id.).
19
As the Ninth Circuit has held, and as Judge Ferenbach stated, “failure to properly address
20
and brief the objectionable issues waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order and/or appeal
21
factual issues from the order of the District Court.” (ECF No. 43 at 8); see Martinez v. Ylst, 951
22
F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991).
23
Here, plaintiff fails to enumerate any specific instance of discrimination. See (ECF No.
24
44). Judge Ferenbach wrote a well-reasoned order that adequately addressed each of plaintiff’s
25
motions and did not subject plaintiff to any form of discrimination. See (ECF No. 43).
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
Therefore, plaintiff’s objection will be denied because he failed to properly address and
brief the objectionable issues. Martinez, 951 F.2d at 1157.
1
Accordingly,
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that plaintiff’s objection (ECF
3
4
5
6
No. 44) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED with prejudice.
DATED August 14, 2017.
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?