Pleus v. ARP FAMILY FARMS, an Arizona general partnership et al

Filing 14

ORDER. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a Certificate of Interested Parties, which fully comply with Local Rule 7.1-1, no later than 4:00 p.m. on 11/24/15. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/17/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 ALBERT PLEUS, 10 Plaintiff(s), 11 vs. 12 ARP FAMILY FARMS, et al., 13 Defendant(s). 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:15-cv-02093-RFB-NJK ORDER 15 This matter is before the Court on the failure of Plaintiff to file a Certificate of Interested Parties 16 as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 and Local Rule 7.1-1. Local Rule 7.1-1(a) requires 17 counsel for private parties to identify all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships, or 18 corporations which have a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case in a Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 19 disclosure statement. If there are no interested parties other than those participating in the case, a 20 statement to that effect must be filed. Local Rule 7.1(b). To date, Plaintiffs have failed to comply. 21 Accordingly, Plaintiffs are ORDERED to file Certificates of Interested Parties, which fully comply with 22 Local Rule 7.1-1, no later than 4:00 p.m. on November 24, 2015. Failure to comply may result in the 23 issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 DATED: November 17, 2014 2015 26 27 28 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?