Pleus v. ARP FAMILY FARMS, an Arizona general partnership et al

Filing 69

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 62 Plaintiff's Emergency Motion for Voluntary Dismissal is GRANTED. This case is dismissed against the remaining defendants without prejudice and without an award of fees or costs. The Clerk of Court is ordered to close the case. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 1/16/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 5 6 ALBERT H. PLEUS, 7 Plaintiff, 8 9 v. Case No. 2:15-cv-02093-RFB-NJK ORDER ARP FAMILY FARMS et al., 10 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 15 I. 16 17 INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Emergency Motion for Voluntary Dismissal (ECF No. 62) without prejudice based upon Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). The Court grants the Motion 18 19 20 and dismisses this case without prejudice and without ordering fees and costs. II. DISCUSSION 21 The Plaintiff has moved for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) against the 22 remaining Defendants in this action – ARP Family Farms; Ephesians 3:20 Farms; Proverbs 31 23 Farms, LLC; Circle 191 Farms, LLC; San Tan Agriculture, LLC; and Nathan W. Arp (the 24 25 “Remaining Defendants”). Rule 41(a)(2) permits a plaintiff to seek voluntary dismissal of an 26 action without prejudice from the district court. Id. “The purpose of the rule is to permit a plaintiff 27 to dismiss an action without prejudice so long as the defendant will not be prejudiced, . . . or 28 1 unfairly affected by the dismissal.” Stevedoring Services of America v. Armilla Int'l B.V., 889 2 F.2d 919, 921 (9th Cir. 1989). 3 4 The Court finds it appropriate to dismiss this case without prejudice and without requiring 5 the Plaintiff to pay fees and costs. The Court finds that Remaining Defendants will not suffer 6 prejudice and they have not raised a significant issue of prejudice. There has been no discovery 7 8 in this case beyond initial disclosures and the setting of a discovery schedule. The Remaining 9 Defendants do not oppose dismissal. The Court therefore will dismiss this case without prejudice. 10 The Remaining Defendants have requested that the Court ordered the payment of 11 reasonable attorneys fees and costs as a condition precedent to the dismissal of this action. The 12 Remaining Defendants assert that if the action is filed anew, they will have to pay additional 13 14 attorneys fees and costs for the new action. The Court rejects the Remaining Defendants’ request. 15 First, given the nature of this case, it is not clear to the Court that any new action by Plaintiff would 16 be substantially different than the facts alleged in this case. The Court finds that the Remaining 17 Defendants can and could continue to benefit from the legal counsel they received in this case 18 regarding the causes of action alleged against them. Second, the litigation has not progressed in a 19 20 significant or substantial manner, so the Court does not find that the Remaining Defendants had to 21 pay for significant legal advice and related costs. While there had been an exchange of initial 22 disclosures, discovery in this case had not actually commenced. Finally, the Court cannot 23 adequately determine whether there is a likelihood or not that the Plaintiff could prevail on its 24 claims against the Remaining Defendants. Considering all of these factors, the Court does not 25 26 27 find that the award of fees and costs would be appropriate as a condition precedent to the granting of a voluntary dismissal without prejudice. 28 -2- 1 2 3 III. CONCLUSION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Emergency Motion for Voluntary Dismissal (ECF No. 62) is GRANTED. This case is dismissed against the remaining defendants without 4 5 prejudice and without an award of fees or costs. The Clerk of Court is ordered to close the case. 6 7 DATED this 16th day of January, 2018. 8 9 ____________________________________ RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?