Campbell v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. et al

Filing 49

ORDER denying ECF Nos. 46 Plaintiff's Motion to Enjoin Existing Brief and 48 Motion for Sufficiency/Evidence. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 05/01/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

GEORKESHIA DENISE CAMPBELL,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
WYNDHAM VACATION RESORTS, INC., et )
al,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________________ )

Case No. 2:15-cv-02127-MMD-CWH

ORDER

10

Presently before the Court is pro se Plaintiff’s motion to enjoin existing brief (ECF No. 46),

11

filed on April 13, 2017. Defendants filed a response (ECF No. 47) on April 17, 2017. Plaintiff did

12

not file a reply. Plaintiff also filed a “motion of sufficiency/evidence” (ECF No. 48) on April 28,

13

2017. Defendants have not filed a response. Also relevant to this matter is a letter (ECF No. 45)

14

from the Beverly Hills City Attorney, filed on April 13, 2017.

15

Plaintiff’s filings, which purport to be from both Plaintiff and the Beverly Hills City

16

Attorney, request leave of the Court for the City of Beverly Hills to “enjoin in the existing brief filed

17

by Ms. Campbell and be named as a plaintiff in fact.” However, according to the Beverly Hills City

18

Attorney, the City of Beverly Hills did not consent to Plaintiff’s filing and does not seek to be a party

19

in this case. See ECF No. 45.

20

Pro se parties are not authorized to make any filings on behalf of other persons or entities.

21

Johns v. Cty. of San Diego, 114 F.3d 874, 876 (9th Cir. 1997). The privilege of acting pro se is

22

personal, and cannot be used to represent another. C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. U.S., 818 F. 2d 696,

23

697 (9th Cir. 1987). Plaintiff, who is acting pro se, is not authorized to make any filings on behalf of

24

the City of Beverly Hills. The Court will therefore deny Plaintiff’s motions.

25

//

26

//

27

//

28

1

1
2
3

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motions to enjoin existing brief (ECF No.
46) and for sufficiency/evidence (ECF No. 48) are DENIED.
DATED: May 1, 2017.

4
5

_________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2