Belssner v. Autodynamics et al
Filing
3
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 2 the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 1 the Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperisis DENIED and the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 3/21/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
CHARLES N. BELSSNER,
4
5
6
Plaintiff,
vs.
AUTODYNAMICS.,
7
8
Defendant.
9
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:15-cv-2128-GMN-PAL
ORDER
10
11
Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States
12
Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen, (ECF No. 2), which states that Plaintiff Charles N. Belssner’s
13
(“Plaintiff’s”) Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, (ECF No. 1), be denied and that the
14
complaint be dismissed without prejudice due to a lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
15
A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a
16
United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B);
17
D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo
18
determination of those portions to which objections are made. Id. The Court may accept, reject,
19
or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge.
20
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is
21
not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an
22
objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized
23
that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation
24
where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114,
25
1122 (9th Cir. 2003).
Page 1 of 2
1
Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed.
2
Accordingly,
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 2), is
4
5
6
ADOPTED in full.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma
Pauperis, (ECF No. 1), is DENIED and the complaint is dismissed without prejudice.
7
8
21
DATED this ___ day of March, 2017.
9
10
11
___________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Court
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?