Tagle v. State of Nevada et al
Filing
118
ORDER Denying 116 Motion for Court's Intervention Under 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 10/18/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
10
11
VICTOR TAGLE,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
STATE OF NEVADA, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:15-cv-02143-RFB-CWH
ORDER
12
13
14
Presently before the court is Plaintiff Victor Tagle’s Motion for Court’s Intervention Under
42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy (ECF No. 116), filed on October 13, 2017.
15
At the hearing on September 29, 2017, the court ordered Plaintiff to refrain from filing any
16
further motions in this case until the court enters a decision on the forthcoming motion to dismiss,
17
except that “Plaintiff may file a motion if necessary to address issues of his physical safety or
18
health.” (Mins of Proceedings (ECF No. 110).) Plaintiff now requests the court’s intervention in
19
stopping “harassment, physical abuse, [] threats . . . and neglect of medical service.” (Mot. (ECF
20
No. 116) at 1.) Plaintiff further states that his “mouth’s full of blisters with puss [and] guards
21
continue their assaults on [him].” Id. Plaintiff does not provide any additional details regarding
22
these issues. Based on the limited information provided in the motion, the court is unable to
23
evaluate whether Plaintiff is entitled to some form of relief. The court therefore denies the motion
24
without prejudice.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
DATED: October 18, 2017
27
28
______________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?