Okeke v. Rodriguez et al

Filing 11

ORDER Granting #9 Stipulation for Extension of Deadline to Answer Petition.. The parties stipulate and agree that good cause exists to correctRespondents' answer deadline from the deadline noted on #8 to the correct answer date of 4/1/16. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/9/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 DANIEL G. BOGDEN United States Attorney District of Nevada BLAINE T. WELSH Assistant United States Attorney 11 BENJAMIN MIZER Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General WILLIAM C. PEACHEY Director, Office of Immigration Litigation-DCS WILLIAM C. SILVIS Assistant Director T. MONIQUE PEOPLES Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division Office of Immigration Litigation-DCS P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044 Phone: (202) 598-8717 Facsimile: (202) 305-7000 Email: monique.peoples@usdoj.gov 12 Attorneys for the United States 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 16 MATTHEW OBIM OKEKE, Petitioner, 17 18 19 20 v. JEH JOHNSON, Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) Case No. 2:15-cv-02178-APG-PAL ) ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) 21 22 JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO ANSWER PETITION (First Request) 23 Pursuant to LR 6-1, 6-2, and 7-1, the parties jointly stipulate to extend the deadline for 24 Respondents to answer or otherwise respond to the Petition filed in this matter. In support, the 25 parties state as follows: 26 1 1. 1 On November 16, 2015, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of mandamus. See 2 Pet., ECF No. 1. Specifically, Petitioner seeks an order from the Court “to compel 3 Respondents to act on Petitioner’s completed I-485 Application to Adjust Status.” Id. at ¶ 1. 2. 4 Plaintiff effected service on Respondents Loretta Lynch, Attorney General of 5 the United States; Jeh Johnson, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Leon 6 Rodriguez, Director of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”); Thomas 7 Cioppa, District Director of the Chicago Field Office of USCIS; and Jeanne Kent, Field Office 8 Director of the Nevada-Las Vegas Field Office of USCIS, all in their official capacities. See 9 ECF No. 8. According to the civil docket for this matter, Respondents’ answer deadlines are 10 February 1, 2016, and February 2, 2016. See Dkt. entry at ECF No. 8. 3. 11 Petitioner effected service on the U.S. Attorney for the District of Nevada on 12 February 1, 2016. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 13 12(a)(2), the “United States, a United States agency, or a United States officer or employee 14 sued only in an official capacity must serve an answer to a complaint, counterclaim, or 15 crossclaim within 60 days after service on the United States attorney.” Thus, despite the civil 16 docket entry notation, Respondents’ answer deadline is April 1, 2016. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 17 12(a)(2). 18 4. Accordingly, the parties stipulate and agree that good cause exists to correct 19 Respondents’ answer deadline from the deadline noted on ECF No. 8 to the correct answer 20 date of April 1, 2016. 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 2 1 WHEREFORE, the parties stipulate and agree that good cause exists to correct 2 Respondents’ answer deadline from February 1 and 2, 2016 to the correct answer date of April 3 1, 2016. 4 5 Respectfully submitted this 9th day of February 2016. AGWARA & ASSOCIATES WILLIAM C. SILVIS Assistant Director /s/ Liborius Agwara LIBORIUS AGWARA 4693 E. Flamingo Road Las Vegas, Nevada 89121 (702) 385-4800 agwaralaw@yahoo.com /s/ T. Monique Peoples T. MONIQUE PEOPLES Trial Attorney 6 7 8 9 10 Attorneys for Respondents Attorneys for Petitioner 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED: UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: STATES 9, 2016. UNITEDFebruary MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED: 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?