Okeke v. Rodriguez et al

Filing 16

ORDER Granting #15 Stipulation for Extension of Deadline to Answer Petition (Third Request). Respondents' answers are due 6/1/2016. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/2/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)

Download PDF
Case 2:15-cv-02178-APG-PAL Document 15 Filed 05/02/16 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 DANIEL G. BOGDEN United States Attorney District of Nevada BLAINE T. WELSH Assistant United States Attorney 11 BENJAMIN MIZER Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General WILLIAM C. PEACHEY Director, Office of Immigration Litigation-DCS WILLIAM C. SILVIS Assistant Director T. MONIQUE PEOPLES Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division Office of Immigration Litigation-DCS P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044 Phone: (202) 598-8717 Facsimile: (202) 305-7000 Email: monique.peoples@usdoj.gov 12 Attorneys for the United States 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 16 MATTHEW OBIM OKEKE, Petitioner, 17 18 19 20 v. JEH JOHNSON, Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) Case No. 2:15-cv-02178-APG-PAL ) ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) 21 22 JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO ANSWER PETITION (Third Request) 23 Pursuant to LR 6-1, 6-2, and 7-1, the parties jointly stipulate to extend the deadline for 24 Respondents to answer or otherwise respond to the Petition filed in this matter. In support, the 25 parties state as follows: 26 1 Case 2:15-cv-02178-APG-PAL Document 15 Filed 05/02/16 Page 2 of 3 1. 1 On November 16, 2015, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of mandamus. See 2 Pet., ECF No. 1. Specifically, Petitioner seeks an order from the Court “to compel 3 Respondents to act on Petitioner’s completed I-485 Application to Adjust Status.” Id. at ¶ 1. 2. 4 Although Plaintiff completed service on Respondents on February 1, 2016, the 5 civil docket entry notation originally indicated that Respondents’ answer deadlines were 6 February 1 and 2, 2016. See Dkt. entry at ECF No. 8. The parties therefore stipulated and 7 agreed that good cause existed to correct Respondents’ answer deadline from the deadlines 8 noted on ECF No. 8 to the correct answer date of April 1, 2016, which the Court approved on 9 February 9, 2016. See ECF Nos. 9 & 11; Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(2). 3. 10 Subsequently, the parties agreed to further extend Respondents’ answer 11 deadline by thirty days from April 1, 2016, to May 2, 2016, in order to allow the U.S. 12 Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) additional time to review and process 13 Petitioner’s I-485 Application to Adjust Status. See ECF No. 13. Because USCIS’ 14 adjudication of Petitioner’s I-485 application could potentially resolve the issues in the Petition 15 without further litigation, the parties stipulated and agreed that good cause existed for the 16 extension, which was approved by the Court. See ECF Nos. 13 & 14. 4. 17 Although USCIS has now adjudicated Petitioner’s I-485 application, another 18 brief extension of Respondents’ answer deadline is required for USCIS to issue to Petitioner a 19 letter notifying him of USCIS’ final decision on his application. 5. 20 Accordingly, the parties stipulate and agree that good cause exists to extend 21 Respondents’ answer deadline by thirty days from May 2, 2016, to June 1, 2016. 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 2 Case 2:15-cv-02178-APG-PAL Document 15 Filed 05/02/16 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 WHEREFORE, the parties stipulate and agree that good cause exists to extend Respondents’ answer deadline by thirty days from May 2, 2016, to June 1, 2016. Respectfully submitted this 2nd day of May 2016. AGWARA & ASSOCIATES WILLIAM C. SILVIS Assistant Director /s/ T. Monique Peoples T. MONIQUE PEOPLES Trial Attorney 8 /s/ Liborius Agwara LIBORIUS AGWARA 4693 E. Flamingo Road Las Vegas, Nevada 89121 (702) 385-4800 agwaralaw@yahoo.com 9 Attorneys for Petitioner 5 6 7 Attorneys for Respondents 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED: UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE May 2, 2016 DATED: 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?