Rosiere v. United States of America
Filing
56
ORDER denying 28 Motion to Strike. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 11/30/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
10
11
12
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
SHAUN ROSIERE,
Case No. 2:15-cv-02187-APG-GWF
ORDER
13
14
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike (ECF No. 28) Defendant’s
15
Motion to Stay, filed on October 4, 2016. Defendant filed its Opposition (ECF No. 38) on October
16
20, 2016.
17
Under Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court may strike from a
18
pleading an insufficient defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter.
19
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f). The essential function of a Rule 12(f) motion is to avoid the expenditure of
20
time and money that must arise from litigating spurious issues by dispensing with those issues prior
21
to trial. Fantasy, Inc. v. Fogerty, 984 F.2d 1524, 1527 (9th cir. 1993), rev’d on other grounds, 510
22
U.S. 517, 114 S. Ct. 1023. However, striking material pursuant to Rule 12(f) is considered a
23
“drastic remedy” that is “generally disfavored.” Nevada Fair Housing Center, Inc. V. Clark
24
County, 565 F. Supp.2d 1178 (D. Nev. 2008).
25
Plaintiff requests that the Court strike Defendant’s Motion to Stay (ECF No. 26) as a
26
frivolous pleading. On October 27, 2016, the Court granted Defendant’s Motion to Stay pending a
27
ruling on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. See ECF No. 42. Therefore, the Court denies Plaintiff’s
28
Motion to Strike as moot. Accordingly,
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike (ECF No. 28) is denied.
2
DATED this 30th day of November, 2016.
3
4
5
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?