Gibbons v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 30

ORDER Denying the parties' 29 Fifth Stipulation to Extend Discovery without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 03/08/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 GREG GIBBONS, 7 8 9 10 11 12 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:15-cv-02231-GMN-CWH ORDER Presently before the court is the parties’ fifth stipulation to extend discovery (ECF No. 29), 13 filed on March 6, 2017. The parties request to extend the current deadlines by forty-five days. 14 Based on the information provided in the stipulation, the court is unable to evaluate the progress 15 the parties have made since their fourth stipulation to extend discovery. The court therefore will 16 deny the stipulation without prejudice. The parties are directed to file a stipulation that complies 17 with Local Rule 26-4, with specific emphasis on describing the discovery completed to date and 18 the discovery that remains to be completed. See LR 26-4(a)-(d). 19 20 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties’ fifth stipulation to extend discovery (ECF No. 29) is DENIED without prejudice. 21 22 DATED: March 8, 2017 23 24 25 26 27 28 ______________________________________ ___________________ ___ _ C.W. Hoffman, Jr. Hoffman, an an United States Magistrate Judge U it d St t M i t

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?