Gibbons v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 30

ORDER Denying the parties' 29 Fifth Stipulation to Extend Discovery without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 03/08/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
GREG GIBBONS,

7
8
9
10
11
12

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY,
)
)
Defendant.
)
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:15-cv-02231-GMN-CWH
ORDER

Presently before the court is the parties’ fifth stipulation to extend discovery (ECF No. 29),

13

filed on March 6, 2017. The parties request to extend the current deadlines by forty-five days.

14

Based on the information provided in the stipulation, the court is unable to evaluate the progress

15

the parties have made since their fourth stipulation to extend discovery. The court therefore will

16

deny the stipulation without prejudice. The parties are directed to file a stipulation that complies

17

with Local Rule 26-4, with specific emphasis on describing the discovery completed to date and

18

the discovery that remains to be completed. See LR 26-4(a)-(d).

19
20

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties’ fifth stipulation to extend discovery (ECF
No. 29) is DENIED without prejudice.

21
22

DATED: March 8, 2017

23
24
25
26
27
28

______________________________________
___________________
___ _
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
Hoffman,
an
an
United States Magistrate Judge
U it d St t M i t