Woodbury Law, Ltd. v. Bank of America National Association et al
Filing
6
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Bank of America N.A. shall file a Certificate of Interested Parties by 12/18/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 12/11/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
WOODBURY LAW, LTD.,
8
9
10
Plaintiff(s),
vs.
BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, et al.,
11
Defendant(s).
12
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:15-cv-02247-APG-NJK
ORDER
13
This matter is before the Court on the failure of Defendant Bank of America N.A. to file a
14
Certificate of Interested Parties. LR 7.1-1(a) requires, unless otherwise ordered, that in all cases (except
15
habeas corpus cases) pro se litigants and counsel for private parties shall, upon entering a case, identify
16
in the disclosure statement required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 all persons, associations of persons, firms,
17
partnerships or corporations (including parent corporations) which have a direct, pecuniary interest in
18
the outcome of the case. LR 7.1-1(b) further states that if there are no known interested parties, other
19
than those participating in the case, a statement to that effect must be filed. Additionally, LR 7.1-1(c)
20
requires a party to promptly file a supplemental certification upon any change in the information that
21
this rule requires. To date, Defendant has failed to comply.
22
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall file a Certificate of Interested Parties,
23
which fully complies with LR 7.1-1, no later than 4:00 p.m., December 18, 2015. Failure to comply
24
may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
DATED: December 11, 2015
27
28
______________________________________
__________________________
_ __
NANCY J. KOPPE
CY
PE
E
United States Magistrate Judge
Magistrate
d
Mag
Ma strat
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?