Harvey v. American Express / DSNB, et al.,

Filing 23

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall file a Certificate of Interested Parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1, no later than 4:00 p.m., 03/11/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 03/07/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 MICHAEL W. HARVEY, 8 Plaintiff(s), 9 vs. 10 AMERICAN EXPRESS / DSNB, et al., 11 Defendant(s). 12 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:15-cv-02259-GMN-NJK ORDER 13 This matter is before the Court on the failure of Defendant Macy’s / Department Stores National 14 Bank to file a Certificate of Interested Parties. LR 7.1-1(a) requires, unless otherwise ordered, that in 15 all cases (except habeas corpus cases) pro se litigants and counsel for private parties shall, upon entering 16 a case, identify in the disclosure statement required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 all persons, associations of 17 persons, firms, partnerships or corporations (including parent corporations) which have a direct, 18 pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case. LR 7.1-1(b) further states that if there are no known 19 interested parties, other than those participating in the case, a statement to that effect must be filed. 20 Additionally, LR 7.1-1(c) requires a party to promptly file a supplemental certification upon any change 21 in the information that this rule requires. To date, Defendant has failed to comply. 22 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall file a Certificate of Interested Parties, 23 which fully complies with LR 7.1-1, no later than 4:00 p.m., March 11, 2016. Failure to comply may 24 result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 DATED: March 7, 2016 27 28 ______________________________________ ______________________ ___ NANCY J. KOPPE NCY J. KOPPE OPPE P United States Magistrate Judge Magistrate ted Ma is is

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?