Allstate Insurance Company et al v. Belsky et al

Filing 276

ORDER granting ECF No. 274 Stipulation for Extension of Time for Plaintiff to Respond to ECF No. 270 Objection/Appeal Magistrate Judge Order. Response due by 3/16/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/1/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

1 DYLAN P. TODD, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10456
2 RENEE M. MAXFIELD, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 12814
3 TODD W. BAXTER, ESQ.
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
4 McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD,
WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP
5 8337 West Sunset Road, Suite 350
Las Vegas, NV 89113
6 Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
7 [e-mail]
[e-mail]
8 [e-mail]
9 ERON Z. CANNON
Nevada Bar No. 8013
10 FAIN ANDERSON VANDERHOEF
ROSENDAHL O’HALLORAN SPILLANE PLLC
11 701 5th Avenue #4750
Seattle, Washington 98104
12 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
13 [e-mail]
14 Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

17 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,
ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY
18 INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE
INDEMNITY COMPANY, and ALLSTATE
19 FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY,
20
Plaintiffs,
21
v.
22
MARJORIE BELSKY, MD; MARIO
23 TARQUINO, MD; MARJORIE BELSKY,
MD, INC., doing business as INTEGRATED
24 PAIN SPECIALISTS; and MARIO
TARQUINO, MD, INC., DOES 1-100, and
25 ROES 101-200,
26

CASE NO.

2:15-cv-2265-MMD-CWH

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND
TO DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTION [ECF
NO. 270] TO U.S. MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S FEBRUARY 7, 2018 ORDER
[ECF No. 263] DENYING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR SANCTIONS [ECF NO.
107] AND MOTION TO DISQUALIFY
PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL [ECF NO. 112]

Defendants.

27 AND RELATED CLAIMS
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
8337 W. SUNSET RD, SUITE 350
LAS VEGAS, NV 89113

2:15-cv-2265-MMD-CWH
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTION
[ECF NO. 270] TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FEBRUARY 7, 2018 ORDER [ECF No. 263] DENYING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SANCTIONS [ECF NO. 107] AND MOTION TO DISQUALIFY PLAINTIFF’S
COUNSEL [ECF NO. 112]

1

Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants

ALLSTATE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

ALLSTATE

2 PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY,
3 and ALLSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY (collectively referred to as the “Allstate Parties”),
4 and Defendants & Counterclaimants MARJORIE BELSKY, MD; MARIO TARQUINO, MD;
5 MARJORIE BELSKY, MD, INC., doing business as INTEGRATED PAIN SPECIALISTS; and
6 MARIO TARQUINO, MD, INC., (collectively referred to as the “Belsky/Tarquino Parties”), by and
7 through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
8

1.

On February 21, 2018, the Belsky/Tarquino Parties filed their Objection [ECF No. 270]

9 to U.S. Magistrate Judge’s February 7, 2018 Order [ECF No. 263] Denying Defendants’ Motion for
10 Sanctions [ECF No. 107] and Motion to Disqualify Plaintiffs’ Counsel [ECF No. 112] (“Objection”).
11

2.

The Allstate Parties presently have until March 7, 2018 to file their response.

12

3.

Due to the Allstate Parties counsel’s work schedule during the weeks of February 26,

13 2018 and March 5, 2018, the Allstate Parties shall now have until March 16, 2018 to file their
14 response.
15

4.

This is the first stipulation for an extension of time to file a response to the Objection.

16 This stipulation is made in good faith and not to delay the proceedings.
17

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

18 Dated:_March 1, 2018.
19

Dated:_March 1, 2018.

McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD,
WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP

BAILEY KENNEDY

20
21 By:
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
8337 W. SUNSET RD, SUITE 350
LAS VEGAS, NV 89113

/s/ Todd W. Baxter
TODD W. BAXTER, ESQ.
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
8337 West Sunset Road, Suite 350
Las Vegas, Nevada 89113
ERON Z. CANNON, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 8013
FAIN ANDERSON VANDERHOEF
ROSENDAHL O’HALLORAN
SPILLANE, PLLC
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4750
Seattle, Washington 98104
Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants

By:

/s/ Joshua P. Gilmore
DENNIS L. KENNEDY, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 1462
JOSEPH A. LIEBMAN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10125
JOSHUA P. GILMORE, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 11576
8984 Spanish Ridge Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148
Attorneys for Defendants &
Counterclaimants

2:15-cv-2265-MMD-CWH
2
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTION
[ECF NO. 270] TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FEB-RUARY 7, 2018 ORDER [ECF No. 263] DENYING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SANCTIONS [ECF NO. 107] AND MOTION TO DISQUALIFY PLAINTIFF’S
COUN-SEL [ECF NO. 112]

1

ORDER

2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

3

1st
DATED this ___ day of March, 2018.

4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
8337 W. SUNSET RD, SUITE 350
LAS VEGAS, NV 89113

2:15-cv-2265-MMD-CWH
3
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTION
[ECF NO. 270] TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FEB-RUARY 7, 2018 ORDER [ECF No. 263] DENYING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SANCTIONS [ECF NO. 107] AND MOTION TO DISQUALIFY PLAINTIFF’S
COUN-SEL [ECF NO. 112]

1
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on this 1st day of March, 2018, a true and correct copy of

3 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO
4 DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTION TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FEBRUARY 7, 2018
5 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND MOTION TO
6 DISQUALIFY PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL [ECF NO. 270] was served via the United States District
7 Court CM/ECF system on all parties or persons requiring notice.
8
By /s/ Mary M. Schnee
Mary M. Schnee, an Employee of
MCCORMICK,
BARSTOW,
WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP

9
10
11

SHEPPARD,

12
13
14

03246-01560 5008537.1

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
8337 W. SUNSET RD, SUITE 350
LAS VEGAS, NV 89113

2:15-cv-2265-MMD-CWH
4
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTION
[ECF NO. 270] TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FEB-RUARY 7, 2018 ORDER [ECF No. 263] DENYING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SANCTIONS [ECF NO. 107] AND MOTION TO DISQUALIFY PLAINTIFF’S
COUN-SEL [ECF NO. 112]