Allstate Insurance Company et al v. Belsky et al

Filing 536

ORDER granting ECF No. 535 Stipulation for Extension of Time. Deadline for parties to respond to Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 518 , 522 ) is extended to 7/7/2023. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/26/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)

Download PDF
Case 2:15-cv-02265-MMD-DJA Document 536 Filed 06/26/23 Page 1 of 4 1 JONATHAN W. CARLSON Nevada Bar No. 10536 2 TODD W. BAXTER Admitted Pro Hac Vice 3 GREGORY S. MASON Admitted Pro Hac Vice 4 McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP 5 8337 West Sunset Road, Suite 350 Las Vegas, Nevada 89113 6 Telephone: (702) 949-1100 Facsimile: (702) 949-1101 7 jonathan.carlson@mccormickbarstow.com todd.baxter@mccormickbarstow.com 8 greg.mason@mccormickbarstow.com 9 ERON Z. CANNON Nevada Bar No. 8013 10 FAIN ANDERSON VANDERHOEF ROSENDAHL O’HALLORAN SPILLANE PLLC 11 701 5th Avenue #4750 Seattle, Washington 98104 12 Telephone: (206) 749-0094 Facsimile: (206) 749-0194 13 eron@favros.com 14 Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 17 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY 18 INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, and ALLSTATE 19 FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, 20 Plaintiffs, 21 v. 22 MARJORIE BELSKY, MD; MARIO 23 TARQUINO, MD; MARJORIE BELSKY, MD, INC., doing business as INTEGRATED 24 PAIN SPECIALISTS; and MARIO TARQUINO, MD, INC., DOES 1-100, and 25 ROES 101-200, 26 CASE NO. 2:15-cv-2265-MMD-DJA STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO RESPOND TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF 518] and [ECF 522] THIRD REQUEST AS TO RESPONSES Defendants. 27 AND RELATED CLAIMS 28 MCCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, W AYTE & CARRUTH LLP 8337 W. SUNSET RD, SUITE 350 LAS VEGAS, NV 89113 Case No. 2:15-cv-2265-MMD-DJA STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO RESPOND TO PARTIES’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Case 2:15-cv-02265-MMD-DJA Document 536 Filed 06/26/23 Page 2 of 4 1 Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants, ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE 2 PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, 3 and ALLSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY (hereinafter “Allstate Parties”), 4 and Defendants and Counterclaimants MARJORIE BELSKY, M.D., MARIO TARQUINO, M.D., 5 MARJORIE BELSKY, M.D., INC. d/b/a INTEGRATED PAIN SPECIALISTS, and MARIO 6 TARQUINO, M.D., INC. (hereinafter “Belsky Parties”), by and through their respective attorneys of 7 record, stipulate and agree to extend the June 30, 2023, deadline for all parties to respond to their 8 respective Motions for Summary Judgment, Allstate Parties [ECF 518] and Belsky Parties [ECF 522], 9 extending the deadline for responses to each motion to July 7, 2023. 10 1. The extension is due to work load issues and scheduling conflicts for respective 11 counsel for the Allstate Parties (Todd W. Baxter), and in light of the critical importance of the Belsky 12 Parties’ motion as to Allstate’s claims herein and the Allstate Parties’ motion on the Belsky Parties’ 13 counterclaims, an extension of time is necessary to complete work on the detailed and complex 14 motions. 15 2. Counsel for Allstate Parties, Mr. Baxter, is involved in a matter that involves the 16 unexpected preparation and filing of a petition for writ of mandate with the Fifth District Court of 17 Appeal by Friday, June 30, 2023, seeking a stay of a trial that is to begin July 11, 2023. In addition, 18 and critically for Allstate’s response herein, an attorney assisting Mr. Baxter with an important 19 segment of the response has had some unexpected emergency issues come up which has impacted her 20 schedule for finishing her segment, which has impacted the completion of the response. Mr. Baxter 21 was also involved in a trial on June 14th through the 15th, involving a petition to terminate the 22 guardianship of three Native American girls. The trial was stopped on the afternoon of June 15th due 23 to the issuance of Haaland v. Bracken by the United States Supreme Court, with the trial court seeking 24 briefing regarding the impact the issuance of the matter will have on the guardianship issues. This 25 was an unexpected event, which has also impact Mr. Baxter’s schedule regarding the response herein 26 for purposes of evaluating this decision and the impact in the matter. Due to the above, Allstate’s 27 counsel is seeking a one-week extension to complete all aspects of the complex response, which 28 includes bringing a motion to file an oversized brief and a motion to seal certain documents. MCCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, W AYTE & CARRUTH LLP 8337 W. SUNSET RD, SUITE 350 LAS VEGAS, NV 89113 Case No. 2:15-cv-2265-MMD-DJA 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO RESPOND TO PARTIES’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Case 2:15-cv-02265-MMD-DJA Document 536 Filed 06/26/23 Page 3 of 4 1 3. There are a number of issues and claimants involved in this case, with extensive 2 discovery having been completed that must be summarized for purposes of responding to the motions 3 that have been filed. The motion for summary judgment filed by the Belsky Parties contains a 454 page points and authorities, with an extensive amount of exhibits attached thereto that must be 5 reviewed and summarized. The motions at issue are of critical importance; however, due to the 6 existing work schedule of counsel for both parties, including, but not limited to, the issues outlined in 7 paragraph 2 above, in order to ensure that the parties have a full and adequate opportunity to respond 8 to the motions [ECF No. 518 and 522], good cause exists to extend the dispositive motion deadline to 9 July 7, 2023. 10 4. Thus, the parties stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for the responses to 11 dispositive motions from June 30, 2023 to July 7, 2023. Additional time is not expected to be needed. 12 5. This stipulation is made in good faith and not to delay the proceedings. 13 Trial has not been scheduled in this matter. 14 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 15 DATED this 26th day of June, 2023 DATED this 26th day of June, 2023 16 CHRISTIANSEN LAW OFFICES 17 FAIN ANDERSON VANDERHOEF ROSENDAHL O'HALLORAN SPILLANE PLLC 18 By: /s/ Todd W. Baxter By: /s/ Samuel R. Mirkovich 19 ERON Z. CANNON JENNIFER M. SMITROVICH 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4750 Seattle, WA 98104 DONALD J. CAMPBELL J. COLBY WILLIAMS SAMUEL R. MIRKOVICH 710 South Seventh Street, Suite A Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 TODD W. BAXTER McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE, & CARRUTH LLP 8337 West Sunset Road, Suite 350 Las Vegas, NV 89113 PETER S. CHRISTIANSEN KENDELEE L. WORKS 710 South Seventh Street, Suite B Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Attorneys for Defendants Counterclaimants Attorneys for Plaintiffs/ Counterdefendants 28 MCCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, W AYTE & CARRUTH LLP 8337 W. SUNSET RD, SUITE 350 LAS VEGAS, NV 89113 Case No. 2:15-cv-2265-MMD-DJA 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO RESPOND TO PARTIES’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Case 2:15-cv-02265-MMD-DJA Document 536 Filed 06/26/23 Page 4 of 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?