Stepanov v. Bank of America N.A et al

Filing 19

ORDER Granting 17 Stipulation for Extension to Respond re 13 MOTION to Dismiss. Responses due by 1/25/2016. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/5/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Case 2:15-cv-02270-APG-NJK Document 17 Filed 01/04/16 Page 1 of 4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

12

David H. Krieger, Esq.
NV Bar No. 9086
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
8985 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 350
Henderson, Nevada 89123
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
[e-mail]

13

Attorneys for Plaintiff Alexander Stepanov

8
9
10
11
KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC
NEVADA, CALIFORNIA

Michael Kind, Esq.
NV Bar No. 13903
KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC
7854 W. Sahara Avenue
Las Vegas, NV 89117
Phone: [phone] x7
FAX: [phone]
[e-mail]

14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

16
17
18
19

ALEXANDER STEPANOV,

20

Plaintiff,

21

v.

22

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
SILVER STATE SCHOOLS
CREDIT UNION, TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT
CORPORATION, AND
EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS, INC.,

23
24
25
26
27

Case No: 2:15−cv−02270−APG−NJK
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO
RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
[First Request]

Defendants.

28

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIP. TO EXTEND TIME

Case No.: 2:15−cv−02270−APG−NJK

Case 2:15-cv-02270-APG-NJK Document 17 Filed 01/04/16 Page 2 of 4

STIPULATION AND ORDER

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC
NEVADA, CALIFORNIA

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
Plaintiff Alexander Stepanov (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Bank of America,
N.A. (“BANA”) (jointly as the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel,
hereby submit this stipulation for an extension of time for Plaintiff to respond to
BANA’s motion to dismiss [ECF No. 13].
WHEREAS, on August 5, 2015, Plaintiff her Complaint in the Eighth
Judicial District Court, District of Nevada;
WHEREAS, this case was removed to this Court on December 1, 2015;
WHEREAS, BANA filed a Motion to Dismiss on December 18, 2015;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s Response to BANA’s Motion to Dismiss is due on
January 4, 2016;
WHEREAS, the Parties agree to extend Plaintiff’s time to respond to
BANA’s Motion to Dismiss to discuss potential resolution of this matter;
WHEREAS, this is the first request for an extension of this deadline by the
Parties.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for good cause,
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Parties as
follows:
(1) Plaintiff shall have until January 25, 2016 to respond to BANA’s Motion to
Dismiss [ECF No. 13].
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

[continued on next page]
______________________________
_________________________
___

25

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
NITED
JU
Dated: January 6, 2016.
5

26
27
28

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIP. TO EXTEND TIME

1

Case No.: 2:15−cv−02270−APG−NJK

Case 2:15-cv-02270-APG-NJK Document 17 Filed 01/04/16 Page 3 of 4

1
2

DATED this 4th day of January 2016.
KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC

3
4
5
6
7
8

By: /s/ Michael Kind
Michael Kind, Esq.
7854 W. Sahara Avenue
Las Vegas, NV 89117
800-400-6808 x7
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff

9
AKERMAN LLP

11
KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC
NEVADA, CALIFORNIA

10

By: /S/ Matthew I Knepper
Matthew I Knepper, Esq.
1160 Town Center Drive, Suite 330
Las Vegas, NV 89144
702-383-8966
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant Bank of America, N.A.

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

IT IS SO ORDERED:

19

______________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20
21
22

DATED:____________________________

23
24
25
26
27
28

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIP. TO EXTEND TIME

2

Case No.: 2:15−cv−02270−APG−NJK