Sonoro Invest S.A. v. Miller et al

Filing 30

ORDER that 29 Motion to Extend Time to Answer/Respond re 11 Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Stephen Goss answer due 3/11/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 2/4/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
7
8
9
10
11

SONORO INVEST, S.A.,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
STEPHEN GOSS, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:15-cv-02286-JAD-CWH
ORDER

12
13

Presently before the Court is pro se Defendant Stephen Goss’s Motion for Extension of

14

Time Within Which to Respond (ECF No. 29), filed on February 2, 2016. Mr. Goss requests an

15

extension of 28 days to respond, though he does not specify which deadline he is seeking to extend.

16

Given that there are not any pending motions in the case, the Court understands Ms. Goss to be

17

requesting additional time to respond to Plaintiff Sonoro Invest, S.A.’s Amended Complaint (ECF

18

No. 11). Having reviewed and considered the motion, and good cause appearing,

19
20
21
22

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Stephen Goss’s Motion for Extension of Time Within
Which to Respond (ECF No. 29) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Stephen Goss must answer or otherwise
respond to Plaintiff Sonoro Invest, S.A.’s Amended Complaint (ECF No. 11) by March 11, 2016.

23
24

DATED: February 4, 2016

25
26
27
28

______________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge