Michaud v. Williams, et al.,
Filing
37
ORDER Re: Plaintiff's 34 Response to Defendant's Limited Opposition. Plaintiff's response does not alter the Court's prior ruling (see Order ECF No. 30). Plaintiff is again advised tofollow the proper procedure to use the funds maintained in his inmate account. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 1/30/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
10
11
JOHN MICHAUD,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
STATE OF NEVADA, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:15-cv-02324-RFB-GWF
ORDER
12
13
14
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Limited Opposition
(ECF No. 34), filed on January 26, 2018.
15
On January 16, 2018, the Court ordered that Plaintiff’s reply to Defendants’ Limited
16
Opposition was due no later than January 24, 2018. Minute Order (ECF No. 26). Plaintiff did not
17
file a reply on that date. Prior to issuing its order, the Court waited an extra day to see if a reply
18
would be filed. It was not. The Court then entered an order denying Plaintiff’s request to have the
19
monies taken from his inmate savings account to pay for the $350 filing fee. This order was based
20
on the fact that Plaintiff had not followed the proper procedures as set forth in Administrative
21
Regulation 258.01(1)(D)(4). See Order (ECF No. 30). Plaintiff’s response does not address that
22
issue and merely states that he still wishes to pay the court filing fee with the funds contained in his
23
account. Plaintiff’s response does not alter the Court’s prior ruling. Plaintiff is again advised to
24
follow the proper procedure to use the funds maintained in his inmate account.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 30th day of January, 2018.
27
28
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?