Michaud v. Williams, et al.,

Filing 37

ORDER Re: Plaintiff's 34 Response to Defendant's Limited Opposition. Plaintiff's response does not alter the Court's prior ruling (see Order ECF No. 30). Plaintiff is again advised tofollow the proper procedure to use the funds maintained in his inmate account. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 1/30/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
7
8
9
10
11

JOHN MICHAUD,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
STATE OF NEVADA, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:15-cv-02324-RFB-GWF

ORDER

12
13
14

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Limited Opposition
(ECF No. 34), filed on January 26, 2018.

15

On January 16, 2018, the Court ordered that Plaintiff’s reply to Defendants’ Limited

16

Opposition was due no later than January 24, 2018. Minute Order (ECF No. 26). Plaintiff did not

17

file a reply on that date. Prior to issuing its order, the Court waited an extra day to see if a reply

18

would be filed. It was not. The Court then entered an order denying Plaintiff’s request to have the

19

monies taken from his inmate savings account to pay for the $350 filing fee. This order was based

20

on the fact that Plaintiff had not followed the proper procedures as set forth in Administrative

21

Regulation 258.01(1)(D)(4). See Order (ECF No. 30). Plaintiff’s response does not address that

22

issue and merely states that he still wishes to pay the court filing fee with the funds contained in his

23

account. Plaintiff’s response does not alter the Court’s prior ruling. Plaintiff is again advised to

24

follow the proper procedure to use the funds maintained in his inmate account.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 30th day of January, 2018.

27
28

______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge