Bagsby v. Eldorado Resorts Corporation et al

Filing 45

ORDER Granting 44 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request). Motions due by 8/30/2017. Responses due by 9/29/2017. Replies due by 10/30/2017. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 4/11/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ANTHONY L. MARTIN Nevada Bar No. 8177 anthony.martin@ogletreedeakins.com JILL GARCIA Nevada Bar No. 7805 jill.garcia@ogletreedeakins.com SHELLEY MURRAY Nevada Bar No. 12831 shelley.murray @ogletreedeakins.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. Wells Fargo Tower 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1500 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: 702.369.6800 / Fax: 702.369.6888 10 Attorneys for Defendants Eldorado Resorts Corporation, Michael Marrs, Kristen Beck, and Dominic Taleghani 11 Santovito Fargo Tower Suite 1500, 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: 702.369.6800 Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 13 14 SANDY BAGSBY, Case No.: 2:15-cv-02330-RFB-PAL Plaintiff, 15 16 vs. 17 ELDORADO RESORTS CORPORATION, a Florida Corporation; MICHAEL MARRS; KRISTEN BECK; DOMINIC TALEGHANI; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, 18 19 20 21 22 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS AND RESPONSES AND REPLIES THERETO (FIRST REQUEST) Defendants. Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, and LR 26-4, Plaintiff Sandy Bagsby (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Eldorado Resorts Corporation (“Eldorado”), Michael Marrs (“Marrs”), Kristen Hayde 23 24 (formerly known as Beck) (“Hayde”), and Dominic Taleghani (“Taleghani”) (collectively 25 “Defendants”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to this first 26 request for extension of time for the parties to file dispositive motions in this action, along with 27 related responses and replies. Pursuant to the Court's March 31, 2017, Order for Extension of 28 1 Discovery Deadlines (ECF No. 43), the current deadline for filing dispositive motions in this case 2 is June 22, 2017. The parties have completed all discovery in this matter and good cause exists for 3 the proposed extension based upon the following: 4 As the Court is aware, this case is one of over thirty related lawsuits sitting before this 5 Court. Recognizing the complexity of litigating these lawsuits simultaneously, the parties agreed 6 7 to divide the cases into five groups and stagger deadlines in order to streamline the litigation process and avoid overlapping dispositive motion deadlines. On March 30, 2017, the parties 9 agreed to a comprehensive briefing schedule for dispositive motions in the remaining groups of 10 11 12 Santovito Fargo Tower Suite 1500, 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: 702.369.6800 Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. 8 cases. (ECF No. 42.) The current status of the comprehensive briefing schedule is as follows: Group III(A)  Defendants shall file dispositive motions by February 27, 2017.  Plaintiffs shall file oppositions by March 29, 2017.  Defendants shall file replies by April 28, 2017. 13 14 15 16 Group III(B) 17  Defendants shall file dispositive motions by March 23, 2017. 18  Plaintiffs shall file oppositions by April 24, 2017.  Defendants shall file replies by May 24, 2017. 19 20 21 Group IV(A) 22  Defendants shall file dispositive motions by April 13, 2017. 23  Plaintiffs shall file oppositions by May 12, 2017. 24  Defendants shall file replies by June 13, 2017. 25 26 27 28 Group IV(B)  Defendants shall file dispositive motions by June 6, 2017.  Plaintiffs shall file oppositions by July 6, 2017. 2 1  2 Group V 3  Defendants shall file dispositive motions by June 22, 2017.  Plaintiffs shall file oppositions by July 24, 2017.  Defendants shall file replies by August 23, 2017. 4 Defendants shall file replies by August 7, 2017. 5 6 In compliance with that stipulation, Defendants filed Motions for Summary Judgment on 8 February 27, 2017, in Barnes v. Eldorado Resorts Corp., Case No.: 2:15-cv-01026-RFB-PAL 9 (ECF No. 60); Kaplan v. Eldorado Resorts Corp., Case No.: 2:15-cv-01015-RFB-PAL (ECF No. 10 11 57); D. Parr v. Eldorado Resorts Corp., Case No.: 2:15-cv-01028-RFB-PAL (ECF No. 50); and Scheinberg v. Eldorado Resorts Corp., Case No.: 2:15-cv-01031-RFB-PAL (ECF No. 63). 12 Santovito Fargo Tower Suite 1500, 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: 702.369.6800 Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. 7 13 14 Unilaterally and without notice to defense counsel, on the day before oppositions were due, Plaintiffs filed a request for an extension to file oppositions to the Motions for Summary Judgment 15 on March 28, 2017, in the foregoing cases: Barnes v. Eldorado Resorts Corp., Case No.: 2:15-cv- 16 01026-RFB-PAL (ECF No. 63); Kaplan v. Eldorado Resorts Corp., Case No.: 2:15-cv-01015- 17 RFB-PAL (ECF No. 60); D. Parr v. Eldorado Resorts Corp., Case No.: 2:15-cv-01028-RFB-PAL 18 (ECF No. 53); and Scheinberg v. Eldorado Resorts Corp., Case No.: 2:15-cv-01031-RFB-PAL 19 (ECF No. 66), seeking to extend the current filing date of March 29, 2017, to April 12, 2017. This 20 21 request remains pending before the Court. Due to this delay, the entire comprehensive briefing 22 schedule has been impacted, causing overlapping and unreasonable deadlines. The delays will 23 make it difficult to comply with the current briefing schedules for the remaining matters. 24 ... 25 ... 26 ... 27 ... 28 3 1 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to adjust the briefing schedule in the manner 2 presented below in an effort to allow the parties to comply with the briefing schedule in a 3 reasonable manner as follows: 4 5 6 7 8 Group III(A)  Plaintiffs shall file oppositions by April 12, 2017.  Defendants shall file replies by May 12, 2017. Group III(B)  Plaintiffs shall file oppositions by May 8, 2017. 10  Defendants shall file replies by June 7, 2017. 11 Group IV(A) 12 Santovito Fargo Tower Suite 1500, 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: 702.369.6800 Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. 9  Defendants shall file dispositive motions by May 31, 2017. 14  Plaintiffs shall file oppositions by June 30, 2017. 15  Defendants shall file replies by July 31, 2017. 13 16 17 18 Group IV(B)  Defendants shall file dispositive motions by June 21, 2017.  Plaintiffs shall file oppositions by July 21, 2017.  Defendants shall file replies by August 21, 2017. 19 20 21 Group V 22  Defendants shall file dispositive motions by August 30, 2017. 23  Plaintiffs shall file oppositions by September 29, 2017.  Defendants shall file replies by October 30, 2017. 24 25 As relevant to this matter, the parties have agreed that the dispositive motion deadlines should 26 27 28 be extended as follows:  Defendants shall file their dispositive motion no later than August 30, 2017; 4 1  2 3 Plaintiff shall file any response to Defendants’ dispositive motion no later than September 29, 2017;  Defendants shall file their reply no later than October 30, 2017 (as the 30th day is 4 Sunday, October 29, 2017). 5 6 This stipulation is not brought for purposes of delay or any other improper purpose. 7 Dated this 10th day of April, 2017. 8 WATKINS & LETOFSKY, LLP OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. /s/ Daniel R. Watkins Daniel R. Watkins Brian S. Letofsky 8215 S. Eastern Avenue Suite 265 Las Vegas, NV 891123 Attorneys for Plaintiff Raymond Coury /s/ Jill Garcia Anthony L. Martin Jill Garcia Shelley Murray 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 1500 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Attorneys for Defendants Eldorado Resorts Corporation, Michael Marrs, Kristen Beck and Dominic Taleghani 10 11 12 Santovito Fargo Tower Suite 1500, 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: 702.369.6800 Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. 9 13 14 15 16 ORDER 17 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 20 21 DATED: 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 April 11, 2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?